Constraining the roughness degree of slip heterogeneity

被引:43
作者
Causse, Mathieu [1 ]
Cotton, Fabrice [1 ]
Mai, P. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble 1, Lab Geophys Interne & Tectonophys, CNRS, Inst Rech Dev, F-38041 Grenoble, France
[2] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Div Phys Sci & Engn, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
关键词
STRONG GROUND MOTION; FREQUENCY-DOMAIN INVERSION; 1992 LANDERS EARTHQUAKE; SOURCE RUPTURE PROCESS; TELESEISMIC BODY WAVE; NORTH PALM-SPRINGS; FINITE-FAULT; APPARENT STRESS; JOINT INVERSION; TECTONIC STRESS;
D O I
10.1029/2009JB006747
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This article investigates different approaches for assessing the degree of roughness of the slip distribution of future earthquakes. First, we analyze a database of slip images extracted from a suite of 152 finite-source rupture models from 80 events (M-w = 4.1-8.9). This results in an empirical model defining the distribution of the slip spectrum corner wave numbers (k(c)) as a function of moment magnitude. To reduce the "epistemic" uncertainty, we select a single slip model per event and screen out poorly resolved models. The number of remaining models (30) is thus rather small. In addition, the robustness of the empirical model rests on a reliable estimation of k(c) by kinematic inversion methods. We address this issue by performing tests on synthetic data with a frequency domain inversion method. These tests reveal that due to smoothing constraints used to stabilize the inversion process, k(c) tends to be underestimated. We then develop an alternative approach: (1) we establish a proportionality relationship between k(c) and the peak ground acceleration (PGA), using a k(2) kinematic source model, and (2) we analyze the PGA distribution, which is believed to be better constrained than slip images. These two methods reveal that k(c) follows a lognormal distribution, with similar standard deviations for both methods.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Abrahamson N.A., 1997, SEISMOL RES LETT, V68, P94, DOI [DOI 10.1785/GSSRL.68.1.94, 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.94]
[2]  
Ambraseys NN, 1996, EARTHQ ENG STRUCT D, V25, P371, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199604)25:4<371::AID-EQE550>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-1
[4]  
ANDERSON JG, 1999, SEISMOL RES LETT, V70, P85
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MECH EARTHQUAKE FAUL
[6]   Rupture process of the 26 January 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj, India, Earthquake from teleseismic broadband data [J].
Antolik, M ;
Dreger, DS .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (03) :1235-1248
[7]   Estimation of source rupture process and strong ground motion simulation of the 2002 Denali, Alaska, earthquake [J].
Asano, K ;
Iwata, T ;
Irikura, K .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (05) :1701-1715
[8]  
ATKINSON GM, 1984, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V74, P2629
[9]   On the expected relationships among apparent stress, static stress drop, effective shear fracture energy, and efficiency [J].
Beeler, NM ;
Wong, TF ;
Hickman, SH .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 93 (03) :1381-1389
[10]  
Ben-Menahem A., 1961, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am, V51, P401