Early vs delayed administration of G-CSF following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

被引:29
作者
Colby, C
McAfee, SL
Finkelstein, DM
Spitzer, TR
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, MGH Canc Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF); hematopoietic recovery; autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bmt.1701203
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
It is well established that recombinant human G-CSF accelerates neutrophil recovery following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). However, the optimal timing of G-CSF following transplantation remains unknown. We have conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated with either early, day +1 (n = 42) or delayed, day +4 (n = 39) administration of G-CSF following autologous PBSCT for a variety of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. G-CSF was given at a dose of 5 mu g/kg/day i.v. as a 2 h infusion beginning either day +1 or day +4 following PBSC infusion and continued until the total white blood count (WBC) was >10 x 10(9)/1. The numbers of transplanted CD34(+) cells were similar in each group. Treatment with early administration of G-CSF resulted in a significantly shorter time to an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of >0.5x10(9)/1 (8.5 vs 10.0 days, P < 0.0003) and shorter length of hospitalization (16.3 vs 18.6 days, P < 0.0008), a trend towards a reduced incidence of infection (53 vs 72%) and a significant decrease in the duration of non-prophylactic antibiotic (NPA) therapy for neutropenic fever (4.0 vs 7.5 days, P < 0.009) compared to day +4 administration. Despite the additional cost of G-CSF, the reduction in the hospitalization and NPA therapy with early G-CSF administration resulted in 11% cost savings overall per transplant at our institution.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1010
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Individual criteria could be optimal for starting G-CSF application after autologous stem cell transplantation [J].
Cetkovsky, P ;
Koza, V ;
Jindra, P ;
Skopek, P ;
Svojgrova, M .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 20 (08) :639-641
[2]   FILGRASTIM FAILS TO IMPROVE HEMATOPOIETIC RECONSTITUTION FOLLOWING MYELOABLATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY AND PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELL RESCUE [J].
DUNLOP, DJ ;
FITZSIMONS, EJ ;
MCMURRAY, A ;
MORRISON, M ;
KYLE, E ;
ALCORN, MJ ;
STEWARD, WP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (05) :943-945
[3]  
FABUABM I, 1991, EXP HEMATOL, V19, P868
[4]  
KHWAJA A, 1993, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V11, P479
[5]   GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ACCELERATES NEUTROPHIL ENGRAFTMENT FOLLOWING PERIPHERAL-BLOOD STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
KLUMPP, TR ;
MANGAN, KF ;
GOLDBERG, SL ;
PEARLMAN, ES ;
MACDONALD, JS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (06) :1323-1327
[6]  
LINCH DC, 1993, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V11, P307
[7]   THE KINETICS OF HUMAN GRANULOPOIESIS FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR INVIVO [J].
LORD, BI ;
BRONCHUD, MH ;
OWENS, S ;
CHANG, J ;
HOWELL, A ;
SOUZA, L ;
DEXTER, TM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1989, 86 (23) :9499-9503
[8]  
MADERO L, 1995, BONE MARROW TRANSPL, V15, P349
[9]  
MCQUAKER IG, 1997, J CLIN ONCOL, V15, P4514
[10]   EXACT SIGNIFICANCE TESTING TO ESTABLISH TREATMENT EQUIVALENCE WITH ORDERED CATEGORICAL-DATA [J].
MEHTA, CR ;
PATEL, NR ;
TSIATIS, AA .
BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (03) :819-825