Volumetric quantitative CT of the spine and hip derived from contrast-enhanced MDCT:: Conversion factors

被引:101
作者
Bauer, Jan S.
Henning, Tobias D.
Mueeller, Dirk
Lu, Ying
Majumdar, Sharmila
Link, Thomas M.
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Inst Roentgendiagnost, Dept Radiol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
bone mineral density; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; femur; fractures; geriatrics; MDCT; osteoporosis; quantitative CT; spine;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.06.1006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to perform volumetric quantitative CT (QCT) of the spine and hip using nondedicated contrast-enhanced standard MDCT data sets and to derive a conversion factor for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment based on dedicated volumetric QCT data sets. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty postmenopausal women with a mean +/- SD age of 71 +/- 9 years underwent routine contrast-enhanced abdominal and pelvic MDCT. Before this imaging examination, standard volumetric QCT of the spine (L1 - L3, n = 40) and hip ( n = 21) was performed. Relations between QCT and contrast-enhanced MDCT findings were assessed with linear regression analysis. RESULTS. Mean lumbar BMD was 84.1 +/- 35.8 mg/mL, and mean femoral BMD was 0.62 +/- 0.12 g/cm(2), as determined with QCT. Contrast-enhancement values with MDCT were on average 30.3% higher than those of QCT in the spine and 2.3% higher in the proximal femur ( p < 0.05). Based on linear regression, a correlation coefficient of r = 0.98 was calculated for lumbar BMD with the equation BMDQCT = 0.96 x BMDMDCT - 20.9 mg/mL. A coefficient of r = 0.99 was calculated for the proximal femur with the equation BMDQCT = 0.99 x BMDMDCT - 12 mg/cm(2) ( p < 0.01). In 17 of 40 patients, 33 vertebral fractures were found. The dedicated QCT and enhanced MDCT data sets did not show a significant difference ( p > 0.05) between patients with fractures and those without fractures. CONCLUSION. With the conversion factors, reliable volumetric BMD measurements can be calculated for the hip and the spine from routine abdominal and pelvic MDCT data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:1294 / 1301
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]
Detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using multidetector CT [J].
Bauer, JS ;
Müller, D ;
Ambekar, A ;
Dobritz, M ;
Matsuura, M ;
Eckstein, F ;
Rummeny, EJ ;
Link, TM .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 (04) :608-615
[2]
A comparison of spinal quantitative computed tomography with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in European women with vertebral and nonvertebral fractures [J].
Bergot, C ;
Laval-Jeantet, AM ;
Hutchinson, K ;
Dautraix, I ;
Caulin, F ;
Genant, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 68 (02) :74-82
[3]
The effects of parathyroid hormone and alendronate alone or in combination in postmenopausal osteoporosis [J].
Black, DM ;
Greenspan, SL ;
Ensrud, KE ;
Palermo, L ;
McGowan, JA ;
Lang, TF ;
Garnero, P ;
Bouxsein, ML ;
Bilezikian, JP ;
Rosen, CJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (13) :1207-1215
[4]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[5]
QUANTITATIVE CT FOR DETERMINATION OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY - A REVIEW [J].
CANN, CE .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 166 (02) :509-522
[6]
Carr JJ, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V221, P380
[7]
Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study [J].
Center, JR ;
Nguyen, TV ;
Schneider, D ;
Sambrook, PN ;
Eisman, JA .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9156) :878-882
[8]
COSTS AND HEALTH-EFFECTS OF OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES [J].
CHRISCHILLES, E ;
SHIREMAN, T ;
WALLACE, R .
BONE, 1994, 15 (04) :377-386
[9]
Spatial relationships between prevalent and incident spine fractures [J].
Davis, JW ;
Grove, JS ;
Wasnich, RD ;
Ross, PD .
BONE, 1999, 24 (03) :261-264
[10]
A COMPARISON OF BONE DENSITOMETRY MEASUREMENTS OF THE CENTRAL SKELETON IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH AND WITHOUT VERTEBRAL FRACTURE [J].
DUBOEUF, F ;
JERGAS, M ;
SCHOTT, AM ;
WU, CY ;
GLUER, CC ;
GENANT, HK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1995, 68 (811) :747-753