Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience

被引:510
作者
Schuessler, WW
Schulam, PG
Clayman, RV
Kavoussi, LR
机构
[1] SE Baptist Hosp, Dept Urol, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Washington Univ, Div Urol, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00543-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To determine the feasibility and efficacy of a laparoscopic approach to the radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Methods. A transperitoneal laparoscopic technique was developed to perform an RRP. Intra-abdominal access was obtained through five 10-mm trocars. After dissection of the prostate, the urethrovesical anastomosis was created via a transvesical approach, The prostate was removed by extending the umbilical incision. Results, Between September 1991 and May 1995, nine laparoscopic RRPs were performed, The operative time averaged 9.4 hours. Only 1 of 9 patients had a positive surgical margin that involved the urethra. Six of 9 patients were completely continent postoperatively. Of the 4 patients who were potent preoperatively, 2 continued to have erections, There were three complications: cholecystitis, thrombophlebitis associated with a pulmonary embolism, and a small bowel hernia into a trocar site, Conclusions, Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is feasible but currently offers no advantage over open surgery with regard to tumor removal, continence, potency, length of stay, convalescence, and cosmetic result. (C) 1997, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 857
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] TRANSPERITONEAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASE OF THE KIDNEY - A COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN SURGICAL TECHNIQUES
    KERBL, K
    CLAYMAN, RV
    MCDOUGALL, EM
    GILL, IS
    WILSON, BS
    CHANDHOKE, PS
    ALBALA, DM
    KAVOUSSI, LR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1994, 43 (05) : 607 - 613
  • [2] Maintaining quality of care and patient satisfaction with radical prostatectomy in the era of cost containment
    Klein, EA
    Grass, JA
    Calabrese, DA
    Kay, RA
    Sargeant, W
    OHara, JF
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (02) : 269 - 276
  • [3] PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF A COST-EFFICIENT PROGRAM FOR RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY
    KOCH, MO
    SMITH, JA
    HODGE, EM
    BRANDELL, RA
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (03) : 311 - 318
  • [4] AN ASSESSMENT OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - TIME TRENDS, GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION, AND OUTCOMES
    LUYAO, GL
    MCLERRAN, D
    WASSON, J
    WENNBERG, JE
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (20): : 2633 - 2636
  • [5] MARSHALL FF, 1996, TXB OPERATIVE UROLOG, P164
  • [6] PROSTATE-CANCER CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
    MIDDLETON, RG
    THOMPSON, IM
    AUSTENFELD, MS
    COONER, WH
    CORREA, RJ
    GIBBONS, RP
    MILLER, HC
    OESTERLING, JE
    RESNICK, MI
    SMALLEY, SR
    WASSON, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06) : 2144 - 2148
  • [7] MILLERCATCHPOLE R, 1991, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V265, P1585
  • [8] Same day surgery for radical retropubic prostatectomy: Is it an attainable goal?
    Palmer, JS
    Worwag, EM
    Conrad, WG
    Blitz, BE
    Chodak, GW
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (01) : 23 - 28
  • [9] SOPER WJ, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V174, P1114
  • [10] IMPACT OF ANATOMICAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON URINARY CONTINENCE
    STEINER, MS
    MORTON, RA
    WALSH, PC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (03) : 512 - 515