Improved outcome in acute coronary syndrome by establishing a chest pain unit

被引:60
作者
Keller, Till [1 ]
Post, Felix [1 ]
Tzikas, Stergios [1 ]
Schneider, Astrid [2 ]
Arnolds, Sven [1 ]
Scheiba, Oliver [1 ]
Blankenberg, Stefan [1 ]
Muenzel, Thomas [1 ]
Genth-Zotz, Sabine [1 ]
机构
[1] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Med 2, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
[2] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Inst Med Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, D-55101 Mainz, Germany
关键词
Chest pain unit; Emergency department; Acute coronary syndrome; Prognosis; Emergency care; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; ELEVATION; MARKERS; TRIAL; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00392-009-0099-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Chest pain units (CPUs) have been established to optimize treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to early and accurately discharge patients with non-coronary chest pain. The aim of this analysis was to elucidate whether treatment of ACS patients in the CPU versus emergency department (ED) has prognostic implications. Patients presenting with suspected ACS to either the ED between August 2004 and June 2005 or the CPU between July 2005 and May 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Of 1,796 included patients, 483 had the discharge diagnosis ACS. When compared to patients with exclusion of ACS they had more cardiovascular risk factors and higher troponin, creatinine and C-reactive protein levels (P < 0.001) at admission. Within 1 year, 37 patients of the ACS group suffered an event. Treatment in the ED compared with the CPU showed a significant increase in hazard ratio of 2.1 (P = 0.034) for the combined endpoint death, myocardial infarction and stroke, remaining unchanged after adjusting for confounders. Event-free 1-year survival was higher in CPU patients for the combined endpoint (P (logrank) = 0.02). These results demonstrate a better 1-year prognosis for ACS patients treated in the CPU instead of the ED, therefore, supporting the idea to establish CPUs in Europe.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 155
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Amsterdam Ezra A., 2002, Cardiology Clinics, V20, P117, DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00069-9
[2]
Bahr Raymond D, 2002, J Cardiovasc Manag, V13, P23
[3]
Bahr Raymond D, 2002, Prev Cardiol, V5, P16, DOI 10.1111/j.1520-037X.2002.00549.x
[4]
Barish R A, 1997, J Healthc Qual, V19, P6
[5]
Efficacy of a 24-h primary percutaneous coronary intervention service on outcome in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice [J].
Bauer, Timm ;
Hoffmann, Rainer ;
Juenger, Claus ;
Koeth, Oliver ;
Zahn, Ralf ;
Gitt, Anselm ;
Heer, Tobias ;
Bestehorn, Kurt ;
Senges, Jochen ;
Zeymer, Uwe .
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 98 (03) :171-178
[6]
Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation [J].
Bertrand, ME ;
Simoons, ML ;
Fox, KAA ;
Wallentin, LC ;
Hamm, CW ;
McFadden, E ;
De Feyter, PJ ;
Specchia, G ;
Ruzyllo, W .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2002, 23 (23) :1809-1840
[7]
Performance assessment of an emergency department chest pain unit [J].
Bragulat, Ernest ;
Lopez, Beatriz ;
Miro, Oscar ;
Coll-Vinent, Blanca ;
Jimenez, Sonia ;
Aparicio, Maria J. ;
Heras, Magda ;
Bosch, Xavier ;
Valls, Valenti ;
Sanchez, Miquel .
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2007, 60 (03) :276-284
[8]
Breuckmann F, 2008, KARDIOLOGE, V2, P389, DOI 10.1007/s12181-008-0116-7
[9]
Development of acute chest pain services in the UK [J].
Cross, Elizabeth ;
How, Steven ;
Goodacre, Steve .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2007, 24 (02) :100-102
[10]
Risk prediction in chest pain patients by biochemical markers including estimates of renal function [J].
Eggers, Kai M. ;
Dellborg, Mikael ;
Oldgren, Jonas ;
Swahn, Eva ;
Venge, Per ;
Lindahl, Bertil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 128 (02) :207-213