The effects of remifentanil on endotracheal suctioning-induced increases in intracranial pressure in head-injured patients

被引:35
作者
Leone, M
Albanèse, J
Viviand, X
Garnier, F
Bourgoin, A
Barrau, K
Martin, C
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Marseille, France
[3] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Marseille, France
[4] Marseilles Univ Hosp Syst, Nord Hosp, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Marseille, France
[5] Marseilles Sch Med, Marseille, France
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000132546.79769.91
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, bronchotracheal toilet may be accompanied by deleterious variations in intracranial pressure (ICP). To avoid these effects, IV opioids have been proposed. Twenty mechanically-ventilated patients received 3 ascending IV doses of remifentanil: dose 1 (1 mug/kg bolus, 0.25 mug/kg/min infusion); dose 2 (2 mug/kg bolus, 0.5 mug/kg/min infusion); and dose 3: (4 mug/kg bolus, 1 mug/kg/min infusion). Endotracheal suction was performed 20 min after the beginning of infusion to assess coughing. Heart rate, ICP, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), middle cerebral artery mean flow velocity (V-MCA), and bispectral index were monitored throughout the 30-min study period. Twelve, 15, and 19 patients receiving dose 1, 2, and 3, respectively, required vasopressors to maintain CPP >60 mm Hg. Suctioning resulted in coughing in 16,15, and 5 patients receiving dose 1, 2, and 3, respectively. An increase in ICP, without change in VMCA, corresponded to the reduction in MAP consistent with the preservation of autoregulation. Remifentanil used as a continuous infusion in head-injured patients is not an effective drug to block responses to suctioning.
引用
收藏
页码:1193 / 1198
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abdallah C, 2002, CAN J ANAESTH, V49, P1070, DOI 10.1007/BF03017905
  • [2] ARMITAGE P, 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES, P727
  • [3] DUPONT WD, 2003, STAT MODELING BIOMED, P345
  • [4] Remifentanil versus alfentanil - Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adult male volunteers
    Egan, TD
    Minto, CF
    Hermann, DJ
    Barr, J
    Muir, KT
    Shafer, SL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (04) : 821 - 833
  • [5] Intracranial effects of endotracheal suctioning in the acute phase of head injury
    Gemma, M
    Tommasino, C
    Cerri, M
    Giannotti, A
    Piazzi, B
    Borghi, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 14 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [6] Glass PSA, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS7, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
  • [7] Uncoupling of the autonomic and cardiovascular systems in acute brain injury
    Goldstein, B
    Toweill, D
    Lai, S
    Sonnenthal, K
    Kimberly, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 275 (04) : R1287 - R1292
  • [8] The effect of remifentanil on the bispectral index change and hemodynamic responses after orotracheal intubation
    Guignard, B
    Menigaux, C
    Dupont, X
    Fletcher, D
    Chauvin, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (01) : 161 - 167
  • [9] Comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial space-occupying lesions
    Guy, J
    Hindman, BJ
    Baker, KZ
    Borel, CO
    Maktabi, M
    Ostapkovich, N
    Kirchner, J
    Todd, MM
    FogartyMack, P
    Yancy, V
    Sokoll, MD
    McAllister, A
    Roland, C
    Young, WL
    Warner, DS
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (03) : 514 - 524
  • [10] A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery
    Hogue, CW
    Bowdle, TA
    OLeary, C
    Duncalf, D
    Miguel, R
    Pitts, M
    Streisand, J
    Kirvassilis, G
    Jamerson, B
    McNeal, S
    Batenhorst, R
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (02) : 279 - 285