Urban regimes and local governance in Britain and France - Policy adaption and coordination in Leeds and Lille

被引:52
作者
John, P [1 ]
Cole, A
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Dept Polit, Southampton SO9 5NH, Hants, England
[2] Univ Bradford, Dept European Studies, Bradford BD7 1DP, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1177/107808749803300307
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Rather than weakening regime theory, comparative analysis illuminates its central theoretical insights. The cases of Leeds (United Kingdom) and Lille (France) show cities in contrasting geographical, cultural, and institutional contexts developing regimelike local polities through business participation in a wide range of public-sector decisions. The five special noninstitutional factors promoting regimes are local business ownership, business integration,large metropolitan context, and economic advantage or disadvantage. The distinctiveness of these cities in their countries is an indication of the degree of policy learning and capacity generation that has taken place.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 404
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ALLEN F, 1996, ATLANTA RISING
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1974, Monopolville
[3]  
CEOLE A, 1995, W EUROPEAN POLITICS, V18, P89
[4]  
Clark T. N., 1994, URBAN INNOVATION, P105
[5]  
COING H, 1977, PATRONATS LOCAUX DEF
[6]  
DELEON P, 1992, LEFT COAST CITY PROG
[7]   URBAN REGIMES IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE - THE POLITICS OF URBAN-DEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN [J].
DIGAETANO, A ;
KLEMANSKI, JS .
URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 1993, 29 (01) :54-83
[8]  
Dunleavy P., 1980, URBAN POLITICAL ANAL
[9]  
Dunleavy P., 1981, POLITICS MASS HOUSIN
[10]  
DUPUY F, 1983, SOCIOLOGIE ADM FRANC