New molecular assays to predict occurrence of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients

被引:33
作者
Pellegrin, I
Garrigue, I
Ekouevi, D
Couzi, L
Merville, P
Merel, P
Chene, G
Schrive, MH
Trimoulet, P
Lafon, ME
Fleury, H
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Reg Hop Pellegrin, Virol Lab, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Reg Hop Pellegrin, Dept Med Informat, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[3] Ctr Hosp Reg Hop Pellegrin, Serv Nephrol, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[4] Univ Victor Segalen, Bordeaux, France
关键词
D O I
10.1086/315688
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Thirty renal transplant recipients, after transplantation, were tested weekly with the following assays: cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia (pp65 Ag), plasma qualitative Amplicor CMV (P-AMP), plasma and peripheral blood leukocyte quantitative Amplicor CMV monitor (P- and PBL-CMM), peripheral blood leukocyte (PBL) quantitative Quantiplex bDNA CMV, version 2.0 (bDNA), and whole-blood Nuclisens pp67 CMV (pp67). Eleven patients developed symptomatic CMV disease, and 7 developed asymptomatic CMV infection. For prediction of CMV disease, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, were as follows: 100%, 63%, 61%, and 100% for pp65 Ag; 100%, 42%, 50%, and 100% for bDNA; 91%, 47%, 50%, and 90% for PBL-CMM; 55%, 74%, 55%, and 74% for P-AMP; 55%, 74%, 55%, and 74% for P-CMM; and 64%, 79%, 64%, and 79% for pp67, First positive results in PBL were obtained 9-10 days before symptoms of CMV disease, compared with 5-6 days in plasma and 0 days in whole blood. PBL assays appear to be more appropriate than plasma assays when pre-emptive therapy is required to prevent the rapid progression from the first detection of the virus to CMV disease.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 42
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   FACTORS INFLUENCING DETECTION OF QUANTITATIVE CYTOMEGALOVIRUS ANTIGENEMIA [J].
BOECKH, M ;
WOOGERD, PM ;
STEVENSAYERS, T ;
RAY, CG ;
BOWDEN, RA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (03) :832-834
[2]   Plasma polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA after allogeneic marrow transplantation - Comparison with polymerase chain reaction using peripheral blood leukocytes, pp65 antigenemia, and viral culture [J].
Boeckh, M ;
GallezHawkins, GM ;
Myerson, D ;
Zaia, JA ;
Bowden, RA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (01) :108-113
[3]   QUANTITATION OF HUMAN CYTOMEGALOVIRUS GLYCOPROTEIN-H GENE IN CELLS USING COMPETITIVE PCR AND A RAPID FLUORESCENCE-BASED DETECTION SYSTEM [J].
BOIVIN, G ;
OLSON, CA ;
QUIRK, MR ;
STCYR, SM ;
JORDAN, MC .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1995, 51 (2-3) :329-342
[4]   RAPID AND SIMPLE METHOD FOR PURIFICATION OF NUCLEIC-ACIDS [J].
BOOM, R ;
SOL, CJA ;
SALIMANS, MMM ;
JANSEN, CL ;
WERTHEIMVANDILLEN, PME ;
VANDERNOORDAA, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1990, 28 (03) :495-503
[5]   CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DNA DETECTION IN SERA FROM PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTIONS [J].
BRYTTING, M ;
XU, WM ;
WAHREN, B ;
SUNDQVIST, VA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (08) :1937-1941
[6]   NUCLEIC-ACID SEQUENCE-BASED AMPLIFICATION [J].
COMPTON, J .
NATURE, 1991, 350 (6313) :91-92
[7]  
Eriksson BM, 1996, CLIN TRANSPLANT, V10, P494
[8]   MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION AFTER RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION [J].
FARRUGIA, E ;
SCHWAB, TR .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1992, 67 (09) :879-890
[9]  
Gaeta A, 1997, J MED VIROL, V53, P189, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199711)53:3&lt
[10]  
189::AID-JMV2&gt