Low-Stabilisation Scenarios and Technologies for Carbon Capture and Sequestration

被引:2
作者
Bauer, Nico [1 ]
Edenhofer, Ottmar [1 ]
Leimbach, Marian [1 ]
机构
[1] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
来源
GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9 | 2009年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
Low-stabilization; Carbon Capture and Sequestration; Biomass; Hybrid Models; CLIMATE PROTECTION; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.209
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Endogenous technology scenarios for meeting low stabilization CO2 targets are derived in this study and assessed regarding emission reductions and mitigation costs. The aim is to indentify the most important technology options for achieving low stabilization targets. The significance of an option is indicated by its achieved emission reduction and the mitigation cost increase, if this option were not available. Quantitative results are computed using a global multi-regional hard-linked hybrid model that integrates the economy, the energy sector and the climate system. The model endogenously determines the optimal deployment of technologies subject to a constraint on climate change. The alternative options in the energy sector comprise the most important mitigation technologies: renewables, biomass, nuclear, carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), and biomass with CCS as well as energy efficiency improvements. The results indicate that the availability of CCS technologies and espec. biomass with CCS is highly desirable for achieving low stabilization goals at low costs. The option of nuclear energy is different: although it could play an important role in the primary energy mix, mitigation costs would only mildly increase, if it could not be expanded. Therefore, in order to promote prudent climate change mitigation goals, support of CCS technologies reduces the costs and - thus - is desirable from a social point of view. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4031 / 4038
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   On the optimal order of natural resource use when the capacity of the inexhaustible substitute is limited [J].
Amigues, JP ;
Favard, P ;
Gaudet, G ;
Moreaux, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1998, 80 (01) :153-170
[2]  
[Anonymous], P WORLD EN C EN FUT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, LIM GLOB CLIM CHANG
[4]  
BAUER N, 2005, 7 INT C GREENH GAS T, V1
[5]  
BAUER N, 2005, THESIS U POTSDAM GER
[6]   Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models [J].
Bauer N. ;
Edenhofer O. ;
Kypreos S. .
Computational Management Science, 2008, 5 (1-2) :95-117
[7]   Specialization and non-renewable resources: Ricardo meets Ricardo [J].
Chakravorty, U ;
Krulce, D ;
Roumasset, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2005, 29 (09) :1517-1545
[8]   The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND [J].
Edenhofer, O ;
Bauer, N ;
Kriegler, E .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (2-3) :277-292
[9]  
Edenhofer O., 2006, ENERGY J SPECIAL ISS, V93
[10]   Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technological change [J].
Gerlagh, R ;
van der Zwaan, B .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (01) :35-57