Informed Public Opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options

被引：35

作者：

de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein ^{[1
]}

Daamen, Dancker ^{[1
]}

Ramirez, Andrea Ramirez ^{[2
]}

Faaij, Andre ^{[2
]}

Hendriks, Chris ^{[3
]}

de Visser, Erika ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, Ctr Energy & Environm Studies, Wassenaarseweg 52, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands

[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst, Grp Sci Technol & Soc, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands

[3] Ecofys, NL-3526 KL Utrecht, Netherlands

来源：

GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 9 | 2009年 / 1卷 / 01期

关键词：

ICQ; public opinion; public perception; CCS; acceptance; choice; information; CHOICE QUESTIONNAIRE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.306

中图分类号：

TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];

学科分类号：

0807 ; 0820 ;

摘要：

In this study, an Information-Choice Questionnaire (ICQ) was used to find out how a representative sample of the Dutch public (n=971) would evaluate and choose between seven mitigation options after having been thoroughly informed. The results suggest that due to the comparison with other mitigation options, people are less positive about CCS options. Still, only few respondents firmly reject the CCS options. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：4795 / 4802

页数：8

共 12 条

[1]

ASHWORTH P, 2006, SOCAL EC INTEGRATION

[2] OPINIONS ON FICTITIOUS ISSUES - THE PRESSURE TO ANSWER SURVEY QUESTIONS [J].

BISHOP, GF ;

TUCHFARBER, AJ ;

OLDENDICK, RW .

PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1986, 50 (02) :240-250

[3]

DAAMEN D, 2006, GHGT 8 TRONDH NORW

[4]

DEBESTWALDHOBER M, 2006, GHGT 8 TROND NORW

[5] AN INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING INFORMED OPINIONS [J].

NEIJENS, P ;

DERIDDER, JA ;

SARIS, WE .

QUALITY & QUANTITY, 1992, 26 (03) :245-258

[6]

Neijens P., 1987, DESIGN EVALUATION IN

[7]

RAMIREZ A, 2005, INTERIM REPORT DECIS

[8]

REINER D, 2006, GHGT 8 TRONDH NORW

[9]

SHARP J, 2006, GHGT 8 TRONDH NORW

[10] SEMANTIC AND PRAGMATIC ASPECTS OF CONTEXT EFFECTS IN SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH [J].

STRACK, F ;

SCHWARZ, N ;

WANKE, M .

SOCIAL COGNITION, 1991, 9 (01) :111-125

← 1 2 →