Binocular rivalry and motion perception

被引:68
作者
Blake, R
Yu, K
Lokey, M
Norman, H
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Kobe Womens Univ, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1162/089892998563770
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In a series of experiments psychophysical techniques were used to study the relation between binocular rivalry and motion perception. An initial series of experiments confirmed that motion enhances the predominance of an eye during rivalry, although the direction of motion does not matter The presence of an annulus of motion immediately surrounding one eye's rival target greatly enhances dominance or that target, but the influence of the annulus progressively decreases as the separation between disk and annulus increased. Opponent directions of motion in disk and annulus yield greater dominance than when dots in the disk and annulus moved in identical directions. in a second experiment the two eyes were adapted to orthogonal, directions of motion, generating strong, distinctively different monocular motion aftereffects (MAEs). Even though the two eyes view physically identical random-motion displays following differential adaptation, binocular rivalry of the discrepant MAEs can occur. Finally, using a stimulus replacement technique to measure detectability of translational and rotational motion, it was found that both types of motion were readily detected during periods of dominance but went undetected during periods of suppression. Taken together, these results bear on the process responsible for rivalry and its neural locus relative to the analysis of different types of motion.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 60
页数:15
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   DIRECTION-SPECIFIC AND VELOCITY-SPECIFIC RESPONSES FROM BEYOND THE CLASSICAL RECEPTIVE-FIELD IN THE MIDDLE TEMPORAL VISUAL AREA (MT) [J].
ALLMAN, J ;
MIEZIN, F ;
MCGUINNESS, E .
PERCEPTION, 1985, 14 (02) :105-126
[2]   SEPARATE MOTION AFTEREFFECTS FROM EACH EYE AND FROM BOTH EYES [J].
ANSTIS, S ;
DUNCAN, K .
VISION RESEARCH, 1983, 23 (02) :161-169
[3]   AFTER EFFECT OF SEEN MOVEMENT - EVIDENCE FOR PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL COMPONENTS [J].
ANSTIS, SM ;
MOULDEN, BP .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 22 :222-&
[5]  
BARLOW HB, 1963, NATURE, V200, P1346
[6]   RELATION BETWEEN VISUAL SURROUND AND MOTION AFTEREFFECT VELOCITY [J].
BELL, HH ;
LEHMKUHLE, SW ;
WESTENDORF, DH .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1976, 20 (01) :13-16
[7]   VISUAL-MOTION, BINOCULAR CORRESPONDENCE AND BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
BLAKE, R ;
ZIMBA, L ;
WILLIAMS, D .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1985, 52 (06) :391-397
[8]   SPATIAL ZONES OF BINOCULAR-RIVALRY IN CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL-VISION [J].
BLAKE, R ;
OSHEA, RP ;
MUELLER, TJ .
VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 8 (05) :469-478
[9]   BINOCULAR RIVALRY SUPPRESSION - INSENSITIVE TO SPATIAL FREQUENCY AND ORIENTATION CHANGE [J].
BLAKE, R ;
FOX, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (08) :687-692
[10]   ANOTHER MEANS FOR MEASURING THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT [J].
BLAKE, R ;
HIRIS, E .
VISION RESEARCH, 1993, 33 (11) :1589-1592