The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures

被引:369
作者
Lipe, MG [1 ]
Salterio, SE
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
关键词
balanced scorecard; performance measures; performance evaluation;
D O I
10.2308/accr.2000.75.3.283
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The balanced scorecard is a new tool that complements traditional measures of business unit performance. The scorecard contains a diverse set of performance measures, including financial performance, customer relations, internal business processes, and learning and growth. Advocates of the balanced scorecard suggest that each unit in the organization should develop and use its own scorecard, choosing measures that capture the unit's business strategy. Our study examines judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard-specifically, how balanced scorecards that include some measures common to multiple units and other measures that are unique to a particular unit affect superiors' evaluations of that unit's performance. Our test shows that only the common measures affect the superiors' evaluations. We discuss the implications of this result for research and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 298
页数:16
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   SENSITIVITY, PRECISION, AND LINEAR AGGREGATION OF SIGNALS FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION [J].
BANKER, RD ;
DATAR, SM .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 1989, 27 (01) :21-39
[2]  
Chow C.W., 1997, MANAGE ACCOUNTING, V79, P21
[3]   The influence of client preferences on tax professionals' search for judicial precedents, subsequent judgments and recommendations [J].
Cloyd, CB ;
Spilker, BC .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1999, 74 (03) :299-322
[4]  
DAVILA A, 1997, CITIBANK PERFORMANCE
[5]  
Dempsey S. J., 1997, Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, V2, P61, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.2346
[6]  
Epstein M.J., 1997, STRATEGIC FINANCE, V79, P28
[7]   MULTITASK PRINCIPAL AGENT ANALYSES - INCENTIVE CONTRACTS, ASSET OWNERSHIP, AND JOB DESIGN [J].
HOLMSTROM, B ;
MILGROM, P .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 1991, 7 :24-52
[8]  
Hsee CK, 1998, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V11, P107, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199806)11:2<107::AID-BDM292>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-Y
[10]   The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (03) :247-257