A randomized trial with a cost-consequence analysis after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy

被引:87
作者
Ellström, M [1 ]
Ferraz-Nunes, J
Hahlin, M
Olsson, JH
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Gothenburg Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00579-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To perform a cost-consequence analysis after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Methods: Women scheduled for TAH were randomized prospectively to undergo the procedure by laparoscopic (n = 71) or abdominal (n = 72) surgery. Postoperative health status was assessed using The Medical Outcome Trust 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire. The financial accounting system at the hospital and information from the local national health insurance office were used for the economic analysis. We evaluated changes in direct costs (hospital costs) and indirect costs (loss of production value) when performing a laparoscopic hysterectomy instead of an abdominal hysterectomy. Results: Postoperative health status improved significantly faster after TLH than after TAH. The direct costs were 1.7% higher and the indirect costs 50.3% lower for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. The total costs were 23.1% lower after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Conclusion: A change in surgical technique from abdominal to laparoscopic hysterectomy was possible without compromising the health status of the patients, and it provided substantial financial benefits to society. (C) 1998 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 34
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] INTRODUCTION OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN A PRIVATE TEACHING COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL
    BERNSTEIN, P
    FENTON, P
    WALLA, K
    PLATT, LD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1994, 1 (04): : 351 - 356
  • [2] LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL - REPORT OF 82 CASES AND COMPARISON WITH ABDOMINAL AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    BOIKE, GM
    ELFSTRAND, EP
    DELPRIORE, G
    SCHUMOCK, D
    HOLLEY, HS
    LURAIN, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (06) : 1690 - 1701
  • [3] CARTER JE, 1994, J AM ASSOC GYN LAP, V1, P357
  • [4] HYSTERECTOMY AMONG WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE - TRENDS IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1970-1978
    DICKER, RC
    SCALLY, MJ
    GREENSPAN, JR
    LAYDE, PM
    ORY, HW
    MAZE, JM
    SMITH, JC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (03): : 323 - 327
  • [5] Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy
    Dorsey, JH
    Holtz, PM
    Griffiths, RI
    McGrath, MM
    Steinberg, EP
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (07) : 476 - 482
  • [6] DRANOVE D, 1995, VALUING HLTH CARE, P61
  • [7] FERRAZNUNES J, 1996, INT ADV EC RES, V2, P434
  • [8] EVALUATION AND THE LEARNING-CURVE OF THE FIRST 100 LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMIES
    HARKKISIREN, P
    SJOBERG, J
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 74 (08) : 638 - 641
  • [9] A COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY
    HOWARD, FM
    SANCHEZ, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 1993, 9 (02) : 83 - 90
  • [10] THE MEDICAL AND ECONOMIC-IMPACT OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY IN A LARGE, METROPOLITAN, NOT-FOR-PROFIT HOSPITAL
    JOHNS, DA
    CARRERA, B
    JONES, J
    DELEON, F
    VINCENT, R
    SAFELY, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (06) : 1709 - 1719