Does home based medication review keep older people out of hospital? The HOMER randomised controlled trial

被引:217
作者
Holland, R [1 ]
Lenaghan, E
Harvey, I
Smith, R
Shepstone, L
Lipp, A
Christou, M
Evans, D
Hand, C
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Med Hlth Policy & Practice, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, Acad Pharm Practice Unit, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Great Yarmouth Teaching Primary Care Trust, Great Yarmouth NR14 8AB, Norfolk, England
[4] Suffolk Publ Hlth Network, Pharmaceut Serv, Ipswich IP3 8LS, Suffolk, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 330卷 / 7486期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38338.674583.AE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine whether home based medication review by pharmacists affects hospital readmission rates among older people. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Home based medication review after discharge from acute or community hospitals in Norfolk and Suffolk. Participants 872 patients aged over 80 recruited during an emergency admission (any cause) if returning to own home or warden controlled accommodation and taking two or more drugs daily on discharge. Intervention Two home visits by a pharmacist within two weeks and eight weeks of discharge to educate patients and carers about their drugs, remove out of date drugs, inform general practitioners of drug reactions or interactions, and inform the local pharmacist if a compliance aid is needed. Control arm received usual care. Main outcome measure Total emergency readmissions to hospital at six months. Secondary outcomes included death and quality of life measured with the EQ-5D. Results By six months 178 readmissions had occurred in the control group and 234 in the intervention group (rate ratio = 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.58; P = 0.009, Poisson model). 49 deaths Occurred in the intervention group compared with 63 in the control group (hazard ratio = 0.75, 0.52 to 1.10; P = 0.14). EQ-5D scores decreased (worsened) by a mean of 0.14 in the control group and 0.13 in the intervention group (difference = 0.01, -0.05 to 0.06; P = 0.84 t test). Conclusions The intervention was associated with a significantly higher rate of hospital admissions and did not significantly improve quality of life or reduce deaths. Further research is needed to explain this counterintuitive finding and to identify more effective methods of medication review.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 295
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Management of Helicobacter pylori eradication -: the influence of structured counselling and follow-up [J].
Al-Eidan, FA ;
McElnay, JC ;
Scott, MG ;
McConnell, JB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 53 (02) :163-171
[2]   The value of inpatient pharmaceutical counselling to elderly patients prior to discharge [J].
Al-Rashed, SA ;
Wright, DJ ;
Roebuck, N ;
Sunter, W ;
Chrystyn, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 54 (06) :657-664
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
[4]  
Begley S, 1997, INT J PHARM PRACT, V5, P111, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.2042-7174.1997.tb00895.x
[5]  
GOODYER II, 1995, BR J CLIN PRACT, V19, P173
[6]   Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ-5D and AQoL [J].
Holland, R ;
Smith, RD ;
Harvey, I ;
Swift, L ;
Lenaghan, E .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2004, 13 (08) :793-805
[7]   THE ABBREVIATED MENTAL TEST - ITS USE AND VALIDITY [J].
JITAPUNKUL, S ;
PILLAY, I ;
EBRAHIM, S .
AGE AND AGEING, 1991, 20 (05) :332-336
[8]   Pharmacist-led medication review in patients over 65: a randomized, controlled trial in primary care [J].
Krska, J ;
Cromarty, JA ;
Arris, F ;
Jamieson, D ;
Hansford, D ;
Duffus, PRS ;
Downie, G ;
Seymour, DG .
AGE AND AGEING, 2001, 30 (03) :205-211
[9]   MEDICINES AND ELDERLY PEOPLE - GENERAL PRACTICE SURVEY [J].
LAW, R ;
CHALMERS, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1976, 1 (6009) :565-568
[10]   Effects of a medicine review and education programme for older people in general practice [J].
Lowe, CJ ;
Raynor, DK ;
Purvis, J ;
Farrin, A ;
Hudson, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 50 (02) :172-175