Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy

被引:68
作者
Schoen, RE
Weissfeld, JL
Bowen, NJ
Switzer, G
Baum, A
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh Canc Inst, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.160.12.1790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is an underused cancer prevention procedure. Physicians often cite patient discomfort as a reason for not requesting sigmoidoscopy, but patient experiences and attitudes toward sigmoidoscopy have not been well studied. Objective: To measure patient satisfaction and the determinants of satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy. Methods: An instrument to assess satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy was developed. Responses were evaluated with a factor analysis, tested for reproducibility and internal consistency, and validated against an external standard. Results: A total of 1221 patients (666 men and 555 women; mean age, 61.8 years) were surveyed after sigmoidoscopy. Examinations were performed by a nurse practitioner (n = 668), internist (n = 344), or gastrointestinal specialist (n=184). More than 93% of the participants strongly agreed or agreed they would be willing to undergo another examination, and 74.9% would strongly recommend the procedure to their friends. Regarding pain and discomfort, 76.2% strongly agreed or agreed that the examination did not cause a lot of pain, 78.1% stated that it did not cause a lot of discomfort, and 68.5% thought that it was more comfortable than they expected. Fifteen percent to 25% of the patients indicated they had a lot of pain, great discomfort, or more discomfort than expected. Women were more likely to have significant pain or discomfort than men (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.3; P<.001). Conclusions: Approximately 70% of individuals who undergo screening sigmoidoscopy are satisfied and find the procedure more comfortable than expected, whereas only 15% to 25% find the procedure unpleasant. Physicians should not project discomfort onto patients as a reason for not requesting screening sigmoidoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1790 / 1796
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] HAS THE USE OF CERVICAL, BREAST, AND COLORECTAL-CANCER SCREENING INCREASED IN THE UNITED-STATES
    ANDERSON, LM
    MAY, DS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1995, 85 (06) : 840 - 842
  • [2] [Anonymous], CA CANC J CLIN
  • [3] American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: Update 1997
    Byers, T
    Levin, B
    Rothenberger, D
    Dodd, GD
    Smith, RA
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1997, 47 (03) : 154 - &
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE SATISFACTION OF PARTICIPANTS AT BREAST SCREENING PROGRAMS
    COCKBURN, J
    HILL, D
    IRWIG, L
    DELUISE, T
    TURNBULL, D
    SCHOFIELD, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 27 (07) : 827 - 831
  • [5] Primary care physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening - Patient and practitioner factors
    Cooper, GS
    Fortinsky, RH
    Hapke, R
    Landefeld, CS
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (17) : 1946 - 1950
  • [6] Cooper GS, 1998, CANCER, V82, P1476, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980415)82:8<1476::AID-CNCR7>3.0.CO
  • [7] 2-7
  • [8] SHORT (35-CM) VERSUS LONG (60-CM) FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY - A COMPARISON OF FINDINGS AND TOLERANCE IN ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS SCREENED FOR COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA
    DUBOW, RA
    KATON, RM
    BENNER, KG
    VANDIJK, CM
    KOVAL, G
    SMITH, FW
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1985, 31 (05) : 305 - 308
  • [9] THE EFFECT OF PHYSICIAN-PATIENT COMMUNICATION ON MAMMOGRAPHY UTILIZATION BY DIFFERENT ETHNIC-GROUPS
    FOX, SA
    STEIN, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1991, 29 (11) : 1065 - 1082
  • [10] GROBE JL, 1983, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V78, P569