Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems

被引:37
作者
Garg, Satish K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Voelmle, Mary [1 ]
Gottlieb, Peter A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Denver, Barbara Davis Ctr Childhood Diabet, Sch Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[3] Univ Colorado Denver, Dept Pediat, Sch Med, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
关键词
Continuous glucose monitoring; Interstitial glucose; Blood glucose; Time lag;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.014
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: To evaluate the system time lag associated with subcutaneous interstitial glucose (IG) sensing and venous blood glucose (BG) of two continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, the SEVEN (R) (DexCom (TM), San Diego, CA) and the Navigator (R) (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA), in adults with type 1 diabetes. Methods: Fourteen subjects wore both CGM systems concurrently during the 15-day study. Reference YSI (Yellow Springs, OH) and CGM data from the in-clinic sessions, conducted on day 5, 10 and 15 of the study were evaluated. The system time lag of CGM system was estimated using various regression method related statistical estimators. Results: The estimated time lags based on different statistical measures are similar within each CGM system. The time lag based on correlation coefficient criteria is estimated as 4.5 +/- 5 min (median +/- IQR) for the SEVEN (R), and 15 +/- 7 mm for the Navigator (R). The ranges of these estimators of two CGM systems were different (2-6 min for SEVEN (R) and 14-15 mm for Navigator (R)). Conclusions: The study findings suggest that commonly accessible statistics, such as correlation statistics, offer estimates that are comparable to complicated approaches. Different time lags were observed with two CGM systems. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 353
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BRAUKER J, 2007, 67 SCI SESS AM DIAB
[2]   A Tale of Two Compartments: Interstitial Versus Blood Glucose Monitoring [J].
Cengiz, Eda ;
Tamborlane, William V. .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 11 :S11-S16
[3]   Comparison of Accuracy and Safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems [J].
Garg, Satish K. ;
Smith, James ;
Beatson, Christie ;
Lopez-Baca, Benita ;
Voelmle, Mary ;
Gottlieb, Peter A. .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 11 (02) :65-72
[4]  
Kovatchev Boris P, 2005, Diabetes Technol Ther, V7, P849, DOI 10.1089/dia.2005.7.849
[5]  
KOVATCHEV BP, 2008, DIABETES TECHNOL THE, V11, P1
[6]   Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects [J].
Kulcu, E ;
Tamada, JA ;
Reach, G ;
Potts, RO ;
Lesho, MJ .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (08) :2405-2409
[7]   Evaluating the Accuracy, Reliability, and Clinical Applicability of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM): Is CGM Ready for Real Time? [J].
Mazze, Roger S. ;
Strock, Ellie ;
Borgman, Sarah ;
Wesley, David ;
Stout, Philip ;
Racchini, Joel .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 11 (01) :11-18
[8]  
Stout P J, 2001, Diabetes Technol Ther, V3, P81, DOI 10.1089/152091501750220046
[9]  
Stout Philip J, 2004, Diabetes Technol Ther, V6, P635, DOI 10.1089/dia.2004.6.635
[10]   Relationship between interstitial and blood glucose in type 1 diabetes patients: Delay and the push-pull phenomenon revisited [J].
Wentholt, Iris M. E. ;
Hart, Augustus A. M. ;
Hoekstra, Joost B. L. ;
Devries, J. Hans .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 9 (02) :169-175