The revised behavior and symptom identification scale (BASIS-R) - Reliability and validity

被引:213
作者
Eisen, SV
Normand, SL
Belanger, AJ
Spiro, A
Esch, D
机构
[1] Edith Nourse Rogers Mem Vet Adm Hosp, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA 01730 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, MAVERIC, Boston, MA USA
[6] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
outcomes assessment; mental health research; patient surveys; measurement;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-200412000-00010
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To assess outcomes of health services, providers need brief, responsive, reliable, and valid measures that can be implemented in clinical settings with minimal cost and burden. The Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32(R)) is a self-report measure developed in 1984 to assess mental health treatment outcomes. During the past 3 years, multiple methods were used to revise the instrument to improve reliability, validity, and applicability to diverse groups of mental health service recipients. Objective: The objective of this study was to field test the revised instrument, make further changes based on analysis of the field test data, and assess reliability and validity of the final version (BASIS-24). Methods: A field test was implemented at 27 treatment sites across the Untied States. A total of 2656 inpatients and 3222 outpatients participated. Factor analytic methods, classic test theory, and item response theory modeling were used to select the most discriminating, nonredundant items for inclusion in the final version of the instrument and to assess its reliability and validity. Item response theory modeling was used to score the instrument. Results: The final instrument includes 24 items assessing 6 domains: depression/ functioning, interpersonal relationships, self-harm, emotional lability, psychosis, and substance abuse. Test-retest and internal consistency reliability were acceptable. Tests of construct and discriminant validity supported the instrument's ability to discriminate groups expected to differ in mental health status, and its correlation with other measures of mental health. Conclusions: Analyses of the BASIS-24 supported its reliability and validity for assessing mental health status from the patient's perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1241
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 2000, HDB PSYCH MEAS
[2]   Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the Beck Depression Inventory [J].
Azocar, F ;
Areán, P ;
Miranda, J ;
Muñoz, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 57 (03) :355-365
[3]  
Browne M., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
[4]   OBLIQUE ROTATION TO A PARTIALLY SPECIFIED TARGET [J].
BROWNE, MW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 25 (NOV) :207-212
[5]   Revising psychological tests: Lessons learned from the revision of the MMPI [J].
Butcher, JN .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2000, 12 (03) :263-271
[6]  
Canino Glorisa, 1994, International Review of Psychiatry, V6, P281, DOI 10.3109/09540269409023267
[7]  
Chall J. S., 1995, Readability revisited: The new Dale-Chall readability formula
[8]   A confirmatory factor analysis of the BASIS-32 in racial and ethnic samples [J].
Chow, JCC ;
Snowden, LR ;
McConnell, W .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (04) :400-411
[9]   Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the psychopathy checklist-revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants [J].
Cooke, DJ ;
Kosson, DS ;
Michie, C .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 13 (04) :531-542
[10]  
CRONBACH LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02310555