Whistler-mediated magnetic reconnection in large systems: Magnetic flux pileup and the formation of thin current sheets

被引:52
作者
Dorelli, JC [1 ]
Birn, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Space & Atmospher Sci Grp, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
magnetic reconnection; MHD simulation; computational plasma physics;
D O I
10.1029/2001JA009180
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
[1] We compute numerical solutions of the resistive Hall MHD equations corresponding to pairwise magnetic island coalescence. The simulation results can be organized according to the relative sizes of three length scales: the electron dissipation length, l(e); the ion inertial length, d(i); and the island wavelength, lambda. We identify three qualitatively distinct regimes of magnetic island coalescence: (1) the resistive MHD limit, d(i) less than or similar to l(e) << lambda; (2) the "whistler-mediated'' limit, l(e) << d(i) << lambda; and (3) the "whistler-driven'' limit, l(e) << lambda less than or similar to d(i). In the resistive MHD limit, magnetic flux piles up outside thin current sheets between the islands. The upstream Alfven speed increases with increasing Lundquist number, and the reconnection rate is insensitive to the Lundquist number. In the whistler-driven limit, the electron and ion bulk flows decouple on the island wavelength scale. Magnetic flux pileup does not occur, and the coalescence proceeds on a whistler timescale that is much shorter than the Alfven time. In the whistler-mediated limit, electron and ion bulk flows decouple in spatially localized "ion inertial sheets'' around the island separatrices. Flux pileup is reduced, and the upstream Alfven speed approaches a nearly constant value as the Lundquist number is increased. The maximum reconnection rate in the whistler-mediated limit is comparable to that observed in the resitive MHD limit over the Lundquist number range 500 < S-lambda < 10000.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Reviews of Plasma Physics
[2]   Fast collisionless reconnection in the whistler frequency range [J].
Attico, N ;
Califano, F ;
Pegoraro, F .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2000, 7 (06) :2381-2387
[3]   Forced magnetic field line reconnection in electron magnetohydrodynamics [J].
Avinash, K ;
Bulanov, SV ;
Esirkepov, T ;
Kaw, P ;
Pegoraro, F ;
Sasorov, PV ;
Sen, A .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1998, 5 (08) :2849-2860
[4]   MAGNETIC RECONNECTION DRIVEN BY THE COALESCENCE INSTABILITY [J].
BHATTACHARJEE, A ;
BRUNEL, F ;
TAJIMA, T .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1983, 26 (11) :3332-3337
[5]  
Birn J, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-SPACE, V106, P3715, DOI 10.1029/1999JA900449
[6]   Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge: Resistive tearing, anisotropic pressure and Hall effects [J].
Birn, J ;
Hesse, M .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2001, 106 (A3) :3737-3750
[7]   MAGNETIC RECONNECTION VIA CURRENT SHEETS [J].
BISKAMP, D .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1986, 29 (05) :1520-1531
[8]   ION-CONTROLLED COLLISIONLESS MAGNETIC RECONNECTION [J].
BISKAMP, D ;
SCHWARZ, E ;
DRAKE, JF .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1995, 75 (21) :3850-3853
[9]   COALESCENCE OF MAGNETIC ISLANDS [J].
BISKAMP, D ;
WELTER, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1980, 44 (16) :1069-1071
[10]   Two-fluid theory of collisionless magnetic reconnection [J].
Biskamp, D ;
Schwarz, E ;
Drake, JF .
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 1997, 4 (04) :1002-1009