Resection of colorectal liver metastases: 25-year experience

被引:215
作者
Ohlsson, B
Stenram, U
Tranberg, KG [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Surg, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Pathol, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s002689900381
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze survival and prognostic factors in 111 consecutive patients undergoing curative resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. In addition, the time periods 1971-1984 and 1985-1995 were compared; criteria for first liver resection did not change with time, whereas the attitude toward reresection was more aggressive during the latter period. Operative mortality was 6% during 1971-1984 and 0% during 1985-1995 (3.6% for all patients). The crude 5-year actuarial survivals were 19% and 35% for patients operated during 1971-1984 and 1985-1995, respectively (25% for the whole period). Relapse at any site was observed in 52 patients (81%) operated during the first period and in 29 patients (67%) operated during the second period; re-resection was performed in 12 (23%) and 15 (52%) of these patients, respective ly. Five-year survival aff er hepatic re-resection was 29% (no operative mortality). In the univariate analysis, significant determinants for long-term survival were, in descending order, a clear resection margin, high degree of fibrosis around the tumor, absence of extrahepatic metastases (including metastases to the liver hilum), use of an ultrasound dissector, low preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, year of resection (1985-1995), and low/moderate grade of liver tumor. There Here no 5-year survivors when extrahepatic metastases were present, the liver tumor(s) had a low differentiation or satellites, or the resection margin was involved with tumor. In the multivariate analysis, the determinants were grade of liver tumor, absence of extrahepatic tumor, few intraoperative blood transfusions, low preoperative serum CEA level, and gear of resection (1985-1995). It is concluded that: (1) an increased rate of hepatic re-resection was partly responsible for the improved outcome after liver resection for colorectal metastases during recent gears; (2) patients with extrahepatic metastases did not benefit from liver resection; and (3) surgery should be performed with a clear resection margin and minimal blood loss.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 277
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] HEPATIC RESECTION OF COLORECTAL METASTASES - INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL FACTORS AND ADJUVANT INTRAPERITONEAL 5-FLUOROURACIL VIA TENCKHOFF CATHETER ON SURVIVAL
    AUGUST, DA
    SUGARBAKER, PH
    OTTOW, RT
    GIANOLA, FJ
    SCHNEIDER, PD
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1985, 201 (02) : 210 - 218
  • [2] BARSKY SH, 1987, CANCER RES, V47, P1663
  • [3] HIGH METALLOPROTEINASE INHIBITOR CONTENT OF HUMAN CIRRHOSIS AND ITS POSSIBLE CONFERENCE OF METASTASIS RESISTANCE
    BARSKY, SH
    GOPALAKRISHNA, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1988, 80 (02) : 102 - 108
  • [4] BUTLER J, 1986, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V162, P109
  • [5] ADJUVANT HEPATIC ARTERIAL INFUSION CHEMOTHERAPY AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION OF COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES
    CURLEY, SA
    ROH, MS
    CHASE, JL
    HOHN, DC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 166 (06) : 743 - 748
  • [6] 100 PATIENTS WITH HEPATIC METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER TREATED BY RESECTION - ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC DETERMINANTS
    DOCI, R
    GENNARI, L
    BIGNAMI, P
    MONTALTO, F
    MORABITO, A
    BOZZETTI, F
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (07) : 797 - 801
  • [7] DETERMINANTS OF SURVIVAL IN LIVER RESECTION FOR COLORECTAL SECONDARIES
    EKBERG, H
    TRANBERG, KG
    ANDERSSON, R
    LUNDSTEDT, C
    HAGERSTRAND, I
    RANSTAM, J
    BENGMARK, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1986, 73 (09) : 727 - 731
  • [8] ELIAS D, 1993, PRESSE MED, V22, P515
  • [9] ELIAS D, 1992, J CHIR-PARIS, V129, P59
  • [10] Hepatectomy with an ultrasonic dissector for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Fan, ST
    Lai, ECS
    Lo, CM
    Chu, KM
    Liu, CL
    Wong, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (01) : 117 - 120