Secondary surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma

被引:273
作者
Rose, PG
Nerenstone, S
Brady, MF
Clarke-Pearson, D
Olt, G
Rubin, SC
Moore, DH
Small, JM
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Metrohlth Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Med, Hartford, CT 06112 USA
[4] Hartford Hosp, Hartford, CT 06115 USA
[5] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Gynecol Oncol Grp, Stat & Data Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Durham, NC USA
[7] Penn State Univ, Milton S Hershey Med Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Hershey, PA 17033 USA
[8] Univ Penn, Ctr Canc, Div Gynecol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, Indianapolis, IN USA
[10] UniPath & Colorado Gynecol Oncol, Denver, CO USA
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJMoa041125
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: We evaluated the effect of adding secondary cytoreductive surgery to postoperative chemotherapy on progression-free survival and overall survival among patients who had advanced ovarian cancer and residual tumor exceeding 1 cm in diameter after primary surgery. Methods: Women were enrolled within six weeks after primary surgery. If, after three cycles of postoperative paclitaxel plus cisplatin, a patient had no evidence of progressive disease, she was randomly assigned to undergo secondary cytoreductive surgery followed by three more cycles of chemotherapy or three more cycles of chemotherapy alone. Results: We enrolled 550 women. After completing three cycles of postoperative chemotherapy, 216 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive secondary surgical cytoreduction followed by chemotherapy and 208 to receive chemotherapy alone. Surgery was declined by or medically contraindicated in 15 patients who were assigned to secondary surgery (7 percent). As of March 2003, 296 patients had died and 82 had progressive disease. The likelihood of progression-free survival in the group assigned to secondary surgery plus chemotherapy, as compared with the chemotherapy-alone group, was 1.07 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.31; P=0.54), and the relative risk of death was 0.99 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.24; P=0.92). Conclusions: For patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma in whom primary cytoreductive surgery was considered to be maximal, the addition of secondary cytoreductive surgery to postoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin does not improve progression-free survival or overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:2489 / 2497
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   TUMOR REDUCTION SURGERY AND LONG-TERM SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CANCER - A DACOVA STUDY [J].
BERTELSEN, K .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (02) :203-209
[2]  
BLESSING JA, 1984, CHEMOTHERAPY GYNECOL, P68
[3]  
Boente M P, 1996, Cancer Treat Res, V82, P337
[4]   Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Tomacruz, RS ;
Armstrong, DK ;
Trimble, EL ;
Montz, FJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :1248-1259
[5]   STAGE-III EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER - THE ROLE OF MAXIMAL SURGICAL REDUCTION [J].
DELGADO, G ;
ORAM, DH ;
PETRILLI, ES .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1984, 18 (03) :293-298
[6]   Predictors of response to subsequent chemotherapy in platinum pretreated ovarian cancer: A multivariate analysis of 704 patients [J].
Eisenhauer, EA ;
Vermorken, JB ;
vanGlabbeke, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (10) :963-968
[7]  
GRIFFITHS CT, 1975, NATL CANCER I MONOGR, P101
[8]  
HACKER NF, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V61, P413
[9]   THE EFFECT OF DIAMETER OF LARGEST RESIDUAL DISEASE ON SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESIDUAL EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
HOSKINS, WJ ;
MCGUIRE, WP ;
BRADY, MF ;
HOMESLEY, HD ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
BERMAN, M ;
BALL, H ;
BEREK, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (04) :974-980
[10]   NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND INTERVAL DEBULKING FOR ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
JACOB, JH ;
GERSHENSON, DM ;
MORRIS, M ;
COPELAND, LJ ;
BURKE, TW ;
WHARTON, JT .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 42 (02) :146-150