Health related quality of life before and after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

被引:46
作者
Link, RE [1 ]
Su, LM [1 ]
Sullivan, W [1 ]
Bhayani, SB [1 ]
Pavlovich, CP [1 ]
机构
[1] James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, John Hopkins Bayview Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
prostatectomy; quality of life; prostatic neoplasms; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000147190.67218.1b
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The viability of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) as a surgical treatment for prostate cancer depends on oncological and health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes. We present a prospective assessment of HRQOL in 122 patients before and after LRP using the validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire. Materials and Methods: EPIC data were collected preoperatively, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after LRP, and all were normalized to patient preoperative baseline responses. Results: Using traditional single question responses, 93.4% of patients were continent (0 to 1 pads) at postoperative month 12. Of previously potent men who underwent bilateral nerve sparing 78.9% reported engaging in sexual intercourse within postoperative year 1. However, EPIC domain scores provided a more comprehensive assessment of functional outcomes. For the urinary incontinence subdomain, the majority of functional recovery was achieved by postoperative month 6, reaching a 74% return to baseline on average. In contrast, recovery of the sexual function subdomain continued throughout postoperative year 1 (to a mean of 64%). Recovery of sexual function was not significantly affected by age or preoperative potency status, although the extent of nerve sparing was a significant predictor of outcome (mean recovery to 75% of baseline for bilateral vs 36% for no nerve sparing at 12 months, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Nerve sparing LRP provides satisfactory first year HRQOL outcomes when assessed with a validated instrument. The time course and extent of functional recovery documented in this prospective study may prove useful for patient counseling before LRP.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 179
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of functional outcome [J].
Anastasiadis, AG ;
Salomon, L ;
Katz, R ;
Hoznek, A ;
Chopin, D ;
Abbou, CC .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (02) :292-297
[2]   THE AMERICAN-UROLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
OLEARY, MP ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
WEIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1549-1557
[3]   Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Bhayani, SB ;
Pavlovich, CP ;
Hsu, TS ;
Sullivan, W ;
Su, LM .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (03) :612-616
[4]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial 70 cases at a US university medical center [J].
Dahl, DM ;
L'esperance, JO ;
Trainer, AF ;
Jiang, Z ;
Gallagher, K ;
Litwin, DEM ;
Blute, RD .
UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (05) :859-863
[5]   Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Fowler, FJ ;
Collins, MM ;
Albertsen, PC ;
Zietman, A ;
Elliott, DB ;
Barry, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (24) :3217-3222
[6]   Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases at Montsouris Institute [J].
Guillonneau, B ;
El-Fettouh, H ;
Baumert, H ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Doublet, JD ;
Fromont, G ;
Vallancien, G .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) :1261-1266
[7]   Comparison of quality of life following laparoscopic and open prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Hara, I ;
Kawabata, G ;
Miyake, H ;
Nakamura, I ;
Hara, S ;
Okada, H ;
Kamidono, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (06) :2045-2048
[8]   Determinants of long-term sexual health outcome after radical prostatectomy measured by a validated instrument [J].
Hollenbeck, BK ;
Dunn, RL ;
Wei, JT ;
Montie, JE ;
Sanda, MG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04) :1453-1457
[9]   Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Hsu, EI ;
Hong, EK ;
Lepor, H .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (03) :601-606
[10]   Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: Results from CaPSURE [J].
Hu, JC ;
Elkin, EP ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Lubeck, DP ;
Kattan, MW ;
Carroll, PR ;
Litwin, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (02) :703-707