Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

被引:529
作者
Bundy, Joshua D. [1 ]
Li, Changwei [1 ]
Stuchlik, Patrick [1 ]
Bu, Xiaoqing [1 ,2 ]
Kelly, Tanika N. [1 ]
Mills, Katherine T. [1 ]
He, Hua [1 ]
Chen, Jing [1 ,3 ]
Whelton, Paul K. [1 ,3 ]
He, Jiang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol, 1440 Canal St,Ste 2000, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Soochow Univ, Med Coll, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
J-CURVE; HYPERTENSION; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1421
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Clinical trials have documented that lowering blood pressure reduces cardiovascular disease and premature deaths. However, the optimal target for reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the association of mean achieved SBP levels with the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in adults with hypertension treated with antihypertensive therapy. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 15, 2015, supplemented by manual searches of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION Studies included were clinical trials with random allocation to an antihypertensive medication, control, or treatment target. Studies had to have reported a difference in mean achieved SBP of 5 mm Hg or more between comparison groups. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate by at least 2 investigators according to a standardized protocol. Network meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled randomized results comparing the association of each 5-mm Hg SBP category with clinical outcomes after adjusting for baseline risk. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. RESULTS Forty-two trials, including 144 220 patients, met the eligibility criteria. In general, there were linear associations between mean achieved SBP and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, with the lowest risk at 120 to 124 mm Hg. Randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 120 to 124 mm Hg had a hazard ratio (HR) for major cardiovascular disease of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.60-0.83) compared with randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 130 to 134 mm Hg, an HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.72) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 140 to 144 mm Hg, an HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.34-0.63) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 150 to 154 mm Hg, and an HR of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.26-0.51) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 160 mm Hg or more. Likewise, randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 120 to 124 mm Hg had an HR for all-cause mortality of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.93) compared with randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 130 to 134 mm Hg, an HR of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.45-0.77) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 140 to 144 mm Hg, an HR of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.36-0.71) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 150 to 154 mm Hg, and an HR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 160 mm Hg or more. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study suggests that reducing SBP to levels below currently recommended targets significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. These findings support more intensive control of SBP among adults with hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 781
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Extending methods for investigating the relationship between treatment effect and baseline risk from pairwise meta-analysis to network meta-analysis
    Achana, Felix A.
    Cooper, Nicola J.
    Dias, Sofia
    Lu, Guobing
    Rice, Stephen J. C.
    Kendrick, Denise
    Sutton, Alex J.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (05) : 752 - 771
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, LANCET, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8
  • [3] Effect of antihypertensive treatment at different blood pressure levels in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analyses
    Brunstrom, Mattias
    Carlberg, Bo
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 352
  • [4] Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Chobanian, AV
    Bakris, GL
    Black, HR
    Cushman, WC
    Green, LA
    Izzo, JL
    Jones, DW
    Materson, BJ
    Oparil, S
    Wright, JT
    Roccella, EJ
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) : 1206 - 1252
  • [5] Effects of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Cushman, William C.
    Evans, Gregory W.
    Byington, Robert P.
    Goff, David C., Jr.
    Grimm, Richard H., Jr.
    Cutler, Jeffrey A.
    Simons-Morton, Denise G.
    Basile, Jan N.
    Corson, Marshall A.
    Probstfield, Jeffrey L.
    Katz, Lois
    Peterson, Kevin A.
    Friedewald, William T.
    Buse, John B.
    Bigger, J. Thomas
    Gerstein, Hertzel C.
    Ismail-Beigi, Faramarz
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (17) : 1575 - 1585
  • [6] Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
    Dias, S.
    Welton, N. J.
    Caldwell, D. M.
    Ades, A. E.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) : 932 - 944
  • [7] Higgins JP., 2011, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V343, P5928, DOI [10.1136/bmj.d5928, DOI 10.1136/BMJ.D5928]
  • [8] A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects
    Jackson, Dan
    Barrett, Jessica K.
    Rice, Stephen
    White, Ian R.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (21) : 3639 - 3654
  • [9] James PA, 2014, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V311, P507, DOI 10.1001/jama.2013.284427
  • [10] SPRINT What Remains Unanswered and Where Do We Go From Here?
    Jones, Daniel W.
    Weatherly, Lyssa
    Hall, John E.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2016, 67 (02) : 261 - 262