Construct validities of the quality of well-being scale and the MOS-HIV-34 health survey for HIV-infected patients

被引:26
作者
Hughes, TE
Kaplan, RM
Coons, SJ
Draugalis, JR
Johnson, JA
Patterson, TL
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT FAMILY & PREVENT MED,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
[2] UNIV ARIZONA,COLL PHARM,CTR PHARMACEUT ECON,TUCSON,AZ 85721
[3] UNIV ARIZONA,COLL PHARM,DEPT PHARM PRACTICE & SCI,TUCSON,AZ 85721
[4] UNIV ALBERTA,FAC PHARM & PHARMACEUT SCI,EDMONTON,AB T6G 2M7,CANADA
[5] INST PHARMACOECON,EDMONTON,AB,CANADA
关键词
HIV; quality of life; quality of well-being scale; construct validity;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X9701700409
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This research assessed the construct validities of two health-related quality-of-life instruments: the Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB) and the Medical Outcomes Study 34-item HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV-34). A sample of 100 adult male, HIV-infected patients, across six HIV disease classifications, was used as subjects. Four convergent validity measures of health-related quality of life were used: CD4 cell counts, beta-2 microglobulin levels, disease classification, and age. All convergent validity measures were significant for the QWB. Forty percent of the convergent validity comparisons with the MOS-HIV-34 were statistically significant. Because the two measures provide different perspectives on health-related quality of life, both instruments appear to be useful in measuring health-related quality of life in this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 446
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials
[2]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEXES - 1993 UPDATE [J].
BERZON, RA ;
SIMEON, GP ;
SIMPSON, RL ;
DONNELLY, MA ;
TILSON, HH .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1995, 4 (01) :53-74
[3]   AURANOFIN THERAPY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
BOMBARDIER, C ;
WARE, J ;
RUSSELL, IJ ;
LARSON, M ;
CHALMERS, A ;
READ, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 81 (04) :565-578
[4]  
COPFER AE, IN PRESS QUAL LIFE R
[5]   METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING HEALTH-STATE PREFERENCES .2. SCALING METHODS [J].
FROBERG, DG ;
KANE, RL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 42 (05) :459-471
[6]  
Guyatt G, 1990, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM, P37
[7]  
Helmstadter G. C., 1964, PRINCIPLES PSYCHOL M
[8]   VALIDITY OF A QUALITY OF WELL-BEING SCALE AS AN OUTCOME MEASURE IN CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE [J].
KAPLAN, RM ;
ATKINS, CJ ;
TIMMS, R .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1984, 37 (02) :85-95
[9]   VALIDITY OF THE QUALITY OF WELL-BEING SCALE FOR PERSONS WITH HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS INFECTION [J].
KAPLAN, RM ;
ANDERSON, JP ;
PATTERSON, TL ;
MCCUTCHAN, JA ;
WEINRICH, JD ;
HEATON, RK ;
ATKINSON, JH ;
THAL, L ;
CHANDLER, J ;
GRANT, I .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 1995, 57 (02) :138-147
[10]   THE QUALITY OF WELL-BEING SCALE - APPLICATIONS IN AIDS, CYSTIC-FIBROSIS, AND ARTHRITIS [J].
KAPLAN, RM ;
ANDERSON, JP ;
WU, AW ;
MATHEWS, WC ;
KOZIN, F ;
ORENSTEIN, D .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) :S27-S43