Life-Cycle Assessment Modeling of Construction Processes for Buildings

被引:109
作者
Bilec, Melissa M. [1 ]
Ries, Robert J. [2 ]
Matthews, H. Scott [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Rinker Sch Bldg Construct, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Construction; Life cycles; Environmental issues; Buildings; nonresidential; INPUT;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000022
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This research examined the environmental impacts due to the construction phase of commercial buildings. Previous building research has often overlooked the construction phase and focused on the material and use phases, discounting the significant environmental impacts of construction. The research was conducted using life-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, which is a systematic environmental management tool that holistically analyzes and assesses the environmental impacts of a product or process. Life-cycle inventory results focused on particulate matter, global warming potential, SOx, NOx, CO, Pb, nonmethane volatile organic compounds, energy usage, and solid and liquid wastes. Results over the entire building life cycle indicate that construction, while not as significant as the use phase, is as important as other life-cycle stages. This research used augmented process-based hybrid LCA to model the construction phase; this modeling approach effectively combined process and input-output (IO) LCA. One contribution was the development of a hybrid LCA model for construction, which can be extended to other sectors, such as building products. Including IO results, especially construction service sectors, is critical in construction LCA modeling. Results of a case study demonstrated that services had the highest level of methane emissions and were a significant contributor to CO2 emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 205
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M, DOI DOI 10.1002/JTR
[2]  
*ATH I, 2008, ATH IMP IND VERS 4 0
[3]  
Delft University of Technology, 2001, ID DAT MAN
[4]  
Frischknecht R., 2001, Database Manual: The ETH-ESU 96 library
[5]   Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings [J].
Guggemos, Angela Acree ;
Horvath, Arpad .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (02) :93-101
[6]   Decision-Support Tool for Assessing the Environmental Effects of Constructing Commercial Buildings [J].
Guggemos, Angela Acree ;
Horvath, Arpad .
JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 12 (04) :187-195
[7]  
Guggemos AngelaA., 2003, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V9, P65
[8]   Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment [J].
Hendrickson, C ;
Horvath, A ;
Joshi, S ;
Lave, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (07) :184A-191A
[9]   Resource use and environmental emissions of US construction sectors [J].
Hendrickson, C ;
Horvath, A .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 126 (01) :38-44
[10]  
Horvath A., 1998, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V4, P111, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(1998)4:3(111)