Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: A clinicopathologic, DNA flow cytometric, p53, and mdm-2 analysis of 49 cases

被引:62
作者
Blom, R [1 ]
Guerrieri, C
Stal, O
Malmstrom, H
Simonsen, E
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[4] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1997.4889
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim. The authors analyzed in a retrospective manner the prognostic significance of p53 and mdm-2 expression, DNA ploidy, S-phase fraction (SPF), and traditional clinical and pathological prognostic factors in patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas. Material. Forty-nine patients were diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma (25 stage I, 4 stage II, 8 stage III, and 12 stage IV), DNA how cytometric analysis and immunohistochemical staining for p53 and mdm-2 were performed on paraffin-embedded archival tissue from the uterine tumors. Results. Of the 49 patients, 35 (71%) died of disease and 2 died of intercurrent disease, The 5-year survival rate was 33%. FIGO surgical stage, DNA ploidy, SPF, mitotic index, cellular atypia, and tumor grade obtained significance (P < 0.05) in a univariate survival analysis of the leiomyosarcomas. In a multivariate analysis with survival as the end point, stage was found to be the most important factor (P = 0.007); DNA ploidy (P = 0.045) and SPF (P = 0.041) also had independent prognostic significance. For FIGO stage I tumors, DNA ploidy (P = 0.04) and tumor grade (P = 0.01) were statistically significant in a univariate analysis, while only grade had independent prognostic significance (P = 0.01) in a multivariate analysis. In a univariate analysis including only FIGO stage I and II tumors with disease-free survival as the end point, p53 overexpression (P = 0.0016), DNA ploidy (P = 0.042), and tumor grade (P = 0.008) obtained significance, In a multivariate analysis, only p53 had independent statistical significance (P = 0.01), All p53 immunopositive stage I-II tumors recurred within 28 months from diagnosis. Conclusion. This study found that stage represents the most important prognostic factor for uterine leiomyosarcomas, DNA ploidy and SPF had independent prognostic value. DNA flow cytometry is useful in gaining additional prognostic information, In stage I patients, tumor grade gives significant information regarding clinical outcome, In addition, p53 overexpression may predict a higher risk of recurrence in early stage leiomyosarcomas. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 61
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   LEIOMYOSARCOMA VERSUS BIZARRE AND CELLULAR LEIOMYOMAS OF THE UTERUS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY BASED ON THE MIB-1 AND PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN INDEXES, P53 EXPRESSION, DNA FLOW-CYTOMETRY, AND MUSCLE-SPECIFIC ACTINS [J].
AMADA, S ;
NAKANO, H ;
TSUNEYOSHI, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1995, 14 (02) :134-142
[2]   PROBLEMATIC UTERINE SMOOTH-MUSCLE NEOPLASMS - A CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF 213 CASES [J].
BELL, SW ;
KEMPSON, RL ;
HENDRICKSON, MR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 18 (06) :535-558
[3]  
CHEN J, 1993, MOL CELL BIOL, V13, P4207
[4]  
COPPLESON M, 1992, GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
[5]  
CORDONCARDO C, 1994, CANCER RES, V54, P794
[6]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[7]   WAF1, A POTENTIAL MEDIATOR OF P53 TUMOR SUPPRESSION [J].
ELDEIRY, WS ;
TOKINO, T ;
VELCULESCU, VE ;
LEVY, DB ;
PARSONS, R ;
TRENT, JM ;
LIN, D ;
MERCER, WE ;
KINZLER, KW ;
VOGELSTEIN, B .
CELL, 1993, 75 (04) :817-825
[8]   MDM2 GENE AMPLIFICATION AND TRANSCRIPT LEVELS IN HUMAN SARCOMAS - RELATIONSHIP TO TP53 GENE STATUS [J].
FLORENES, VA ;
MAELANDSMO, GM ;
FORUS, A ;
ANDREASSEN, A ;
MYKLEBOST, O ;
FODSTAD, O .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1994, 86 (17) :1297-1302
[9]   Uterine leiomyosarcoma: Analysis of treatment failures and survival [J].
Gadducci, A ;
Landoni, F ;
Sartori, E ;
Zola, P ;
Maggino, T ;
Lissoni, A ;
Bazzurini, L ;
Arisio, R ;
Romagnolo, C ;
Cristofani, R .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (01) :25-32
[10]   CONVENTION ON NOMENCLATURE FOR DNA CYTOMETRY [J].
HIDDEMANN, W ;
SCHUMANN, J ;
ANDREEFF, M ;
BARLOGIE, B ;
HERMAN, CJ ;
LEIF, RC ;
MAYALL, BH ;
MURPHY, RF ;
SANDBERG, AA .
CYTOMETRY, 1984, 5 (05) :445-446