Effect of within-strain sample size on QTL detection and mapping using recombinant inbred mouse strains

被引:129
作者
Belknap, JK [1 ]
机构
[1] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Res Serv 151W, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Behav Neurosci, Portland Alcohol Res Ctr, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
recombinant inbred strain; quantitative trait locus; chromosome mapping; quantitative genetics; mouse;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021404714631
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Increasing the number of mice used to calculate recombinant inbred (RI) strain means increases the accuracy of determining the phenotype associated with each genotype (strain), which in turn enhances quantitative trait locus (QTL) detection and mapping. The purpose of this paper is to examine quantitatively the effect of within-strain sample size (n) on additive QTL mapping efficiency and to make comparisons with F-2 and backcross (BC) populations, where each genotype is represented by only a single mouse. When 25 RI strains are used, the estimated equivalent number of F-2 mice yielding the same power to detect QTLs varies inversely as a function of the heritability of the trait in the RI population (h(RI)(2)). For example, testing 25 strains with n = 10 per strain is approximately equivalent to 160 F-2 mice when h(RI)(2) = 0.2, but only 55 when h(RI)(2) = 0.6. While increasing n is always beneficial, the gain in power as n increases is greatest when h(RI)(2) is low and is much diminished at high h(RI)(2) values. Thus, when h(RI)(2) is high, there is little advantage of large n, even when n approaches infinity. A cost analysis suggested that RI populations are more cost-effective than conventional selectively genotyped F-2 populations at h(RI)(2) values likely to be seen in behavioral studies. However, with DNA pooling, this advantage is greatly reduced and may be reversed depending on the values of h(RI)(2) and n.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 38
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] BAILEY DW, 1981, MOUSE BIOMEDICAL RES, V1, P223
  • [2] Basten C.J., 1996, QTL CARTOGRAPHER REF
  • [3] Type I and Type II error rates for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping studies using recombinant inbred mouse strains
    Belknap, JK
    Mitchell, SR
    OToole, LA
    Helms, ML
    Crabbe, JC
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1996, 26 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [4] Short-term selective breeding as a tool for QTL mapping: Ethanol preference drinking in mice
    Belknap, JK
    Richards, SP
    OToole, LA
    Helms, ML
    [J]. BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1997, 27 (01) : 55 - 66
  • [5] BELKNAP JK, 1997, HDB PSYCHIAT GENETIC, pCH25
  • [6] GENETIC ANIMAL-MODELS OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG-ABUSE
    CRABBE, JC
    BELKNAP, JK
    BUCK, KJ
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5166) : 1715 - 1723
  • [7] SELECTIVE GENOTYPING FOR DETERMINATION OF LINKAGE BETWEEN A MARKER LOCUS AND A QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS
    DARVASI, A
    SOLLER, M
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1992, 85 (2-3) : 353 - 359
  • [8] The effect of selective genotyping on QTL mapping accuracy
    Darvasi, A
    [J]. MAMMALIAN GENOME, 1997, 8 (01) : 67 - 68
  • [9] DARVASI A, 1994, GENETICS, V138, P1365
  • [10] LS-X-SS RECOMBINANT INBRED STRAINS OF MICE - INITIAL CHARACTERIZATION
    DEFRIES, JC
    WILSON, JR
    ERWIN, VG
    PETERSEN, DR
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 13 (02) : 196 - 200