How to build multifunctional agricultural landscapes in the US Corn Belt: Add perennials and partnerships

被引:44
作者
Atwell, Ryan C. [1 ]
Schulte, Lisa A. [1 ]
Westphal, Lynne M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, No Res Stn, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
关键词
Complexity; Ecosystem services; Participatory; Policy; Social capital; Scale; RESILIENCE; BIOFUELS; POLICY; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.02.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservation of ecosystem services in agricultural regions worldwide is foundational to, but often perceived to be in competition with, other societal outcomes, including food and energy production and thriving rural communities. To address this tension, we engaged regional leaders in agriculture, conservation, and policy from the state of Iowa (USA) in a participatory workshop and follow-up interviews. Our goal was to determine constraints to, and leverage points for, broad-scale implementation of practices that use perennial vegetation to bolster ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes. Qualitative analysis of workshop and interview data highlighted the complexity involved in achieving multi-objective societal outcomes across privately owned, working landscapes especially as the Corn Belt region enters a period of rapid reorganization driven by the demand for bioenergy crops. These leaders indicated that initiatives focusing on perennials have the potential to span differences between conservation and agricultural interests by blurring the distinction between working lands and protected areas. Landscape change that transcends private property boundaries to accomplish this goal is dependent upon: (1) facilitation of vertical and horizontal forms of social capital between social actors from different scales and perspectives, and (2) scale appropriate mechanisms that increase the value of perennial practices for farm owners and operators. Our data highlight the adaptive capacity of regional actors to act as intermediaries to shape macro-scale markets, technologies, and policies in ways that are compatible with the needs, the capabilities, and the conservation of local human and natural resources. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1090
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Allison H., 2006, Science and Policy in natural resource management
[2]  
Allison HE, 2004, ECOL SOC, V9
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems building resilience for complexity and change
[4]  
[Anonymous], CORN BELT GULF SOCIE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMEN
[6]   Landscape, community, countryside: linking biophysical and social scales in US Corn Belt agricultural landscapes [J].
Atwell, Ryan C. ;
Schulte, Lisa A. ;
Westphal, Lynne M. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2009, 24 (06) :791-806
[7]  
Atwell RC, 2009, ECOL SOC, V14
[8]   Science, expertise, and the democratization of the decision-making process [J].
Carolan, Michael S. .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2006, 19 (07) :661-668
[9]   A Sociological Look at Biofuels: Ethanol in the Early Decades of the Twentieth Century and Lessons for Today [J].
Carolan, Michael S. .
RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2009, 74 (01) :86-112
[10]   Ecology for transformation [J].
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Folke, Carl .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2006, 21 (06) :309-315