Acetate-free biofiltration versus bicarbonate haemodialysis in the treatment of patients with diabetic nephropathy: a cross-over multicentric study

被引:38
作者
Verzetti, G [1 ]
Navino, C
Bolzani, R
Galli, G
Panzetta, G
机构
[1] Osped Maggiore La Carita, Div Nefrol & Dialisi, Novara, Italy
[2] Univ Modena, Dipartimento Stat, I-41100 Modena, Italy
[3] Osped Maggiore Trieste, Serv Nefrol & Dialisi, Trieste, Italy
关键词
acetate-free biofiltration; bicarbonate haemodialysis; diabetic nephropathy; morbidity rates; RDT;
D O I
10.1093/ndt/13.4.955
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Morbidity and mortality rates in diabetic patients on regular dialysis treatment (RDT) are higher than in non-diabetic-subjects on RDT. Moreover, diabetic patients experience an intradialitic morbidity unacceptably higher than in patients with other causes of terminal renal failure. The aim of the present investigation was to compare standard bicarbonate haemodialysis (BHD) with acetate-free biofiltration (AFB) in a group of 41 diabetic patients stable on dialysis treatment for 25+/-22 months. Methods. Twenty-four type II and 17 type I diabetic patients, all requiring insulin therapy, were included and were followed for 1 year in a 6-month cross-over randomized study for both methods. The analysis was carried out on dialysis symptoms, interdialysis symptoms, and nutritional status, and the multivariate analysis of variance for repeated measures on the same subjects in the two techniques was used. Results. AFB significantly reduced dialytic and extradialytic symptoms (P=0.003 and 0.001 respectively). Cardiovascular collapses decreased by 43%, and other dialysis symptoms showed a similar trend (-35%). The interdialysis symptoms decreased by 28% and were accompanied by an increase in subjective wellbeing (39%) when patients were switched from traditional haemodialysis to AFB. Acid-base control was better with AFB (P=0.01), both at the beginning and during the session. Slightly significant differences were also obtained for Kt/V (AFB 1.48+/-0.29 vs BHD 1.38+/-0.30), while no significant difference was noted with respect to sodium mass balance, nutritional status, calorie-protein intake, nPCR, blood glucose profile, and insulin requirements. The number of hospital admissions and the mortality rate, which were much lower during the AFB than the BHD period, were not analysed statistically. Conclusions. AFB allows better control of some metabolic aspects, reduces intra-and extradialysis symptoms, and improves patient quality of life. Whether the long-term prognosis can be improved by AFB remains to be established with further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:955 / 961
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Anderson T., 1984, INTRO MULTIVARIATE S
[2]  
ANG KS, 1992, NEW INSIGHTS FUTURE, V320, P115
[3]  
BENE B, 1985, BLOOD PURIFICAT, V2, P217
[4]   Metabolic acidosis and nutrition in dialysis patients [J].
Bergstrom, J .
BLOOD PURIFICATION, 1995, 13 (06) :361-367
[5]   RESULTS OF RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY IN EUROPE, 1980 TO 1987 [J].
BRUNNER, FP ;
SELWOOD, NH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1990, 15 (05) :384-396
[6]   UREA INDEX AND OTHER PREDICTORS OF HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT SURVIVAL [J].
COLLINS, AJ ;
MA, JZ ;
UMEN, A ;
KESHAVIAH, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1994, 23 (02) :272-282
[7]  
COPPO R, 1992, NEW INSIGHTS FUTURE, V320, P134
[8]  
DEGRODT MH, 1989, PROBABILITY STAT
[9]  
*EDTA, 1993, FIG ANN REP MAN REN, V24
[10]   HEMODIALYSIS IN THE DIABETIC PATIENT WITH END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE [J].
LEEHEY, DJ .
RENAL FAILURE, 1994, 16 (05) :547-553