Pregnancy loss rates after midtrimester amniocentesis

被引:161
作者
Eddleman, Keith A.
Malone, Fergal D.
Sullivan, Lisa
Dukes, Kim
Berkowitz, Richard L.
Kharbutli, Yara
Porter, T. Flint
Luthy, David A.
Comstock, Christine H.
Saade, George R.
Klugman, Susan
Dugoff, Lorraine
Craigo, Sabrina D.
Timor-Tritsch, Ilan E.
Carr, Stephen R.
Wolfe, Honor M.
D'Alton, Mary E.
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Biostat & DM STAT, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[5] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[6] William Beaumont Hosp, Royal Oak, MI USA
[7] Univ Texas, Med Branch, Galveston, TX 77550 USA
[8] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[9] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[10] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[11] NYU, New York, NY USA
[12] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Providence, RI 02905 USA
[13] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000240135.13594.07
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the contemporary procedure-related loss rate after midtrimester amniocentesis using a database generated from patients who were recruited to the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk for Aneuploidy trial. METHODS: A total of 35,003 unselected patients from the general population with viable singleton pregnancies were enrolled in the First And Second Trimester Evaluation of Risk for Aneuploidy trial between 10 3/7 and 13 6/7 weeks gestation and followed up prospectively for complete pregnancy outcome information. Patients who either did (study group, n=3,096) or did not (control group, n=31,907) undergo midtrimester amniocentesis were identified from the database. The rate of fetal loss less than 24 weeks of gestation was compared between the two groups, and multiple logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: The spontaneous fetal loss rate less than 24 weeks of gestation in the study group was 1.0% and was not statistically different from the background 0.94% rate seen in the control group (P=.74,95% confidence interval -0.26%,0.49%). The procedure-related loss rate after amniocentesis was 0.06% (1.0% minus the background rate of 0.94%). Women undergoing amniocentesis were 1.1 times more likely to have a spontaneous loss (95% confidence interval 0.7-15). CONCLUSION: The procedure-related fetal loss rate after midtrimester amniocentesis performed on patients in a contemporary prospective clinical trial was 0.06%. There was no significant difference in loss rates between those undergoing amniocentesis and those not undergoing amniocentesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1072
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1976, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V236, P1471
  • [2] ANTENATAL SEX DETERMINATION
    FUCHS, F
    RIIS, P
    [J]. NATURE, 1956, 177 (4503) : 330 - 330
  • [3] Gindler J. S., 1995, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V44, P1
  • [4] First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome
    Malone, FD
    Canick, JA
    Ball, RH
    Nyberg, DA
    Comstock, CH
    Bukowski, R
    Berkowitz, RL
    Gross, SJ
    Dugoff, L
    Craigo, SD
    Timor-Tritsch, IE
    Carr, SR
    Wolfe, HM
    Dukes, K
    Bianchi, DW
    Rudnicka, AR
    Hackshaw, AK
    Lambert-Messerlian, G
    Wald, NJ
    D'Alton, ME
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (19) : 2001 - 2011
  • [5] MARTIN JA, 2003, NATL VITAL STAT REP, V54, P1
  • [6] Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: How safe?
    Seeds, John W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (02) : 608 - 616
  • [7] SIMPSON NE, 1976, CAN MED ASSOC J, V115, P739
  • [8] STEELE MW, 1966, LANCET, V1, P383
  • [9] TABOR A, 1986, LANCET, V1, P1287
  • [10] Wilson RD, 1998, LANCET, V351, P242