Effect of preventive primary care outreach on health related quality of life among older adults at risk of functional decline: randomised controlled trial

被引:33
作者
Ploeg, Jenny [1 ]
Brazil, Kevin [2 ,3 ]
Hutchison, Brian [4 ]
Kaczorowski, Janusz [5 ]
Dalby, Dawn M. [6 ]
Goldsmith, Charles H. [7 ]
Furlong, William [8 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Family Med, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat,Div Palliat Care, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[3] St Josephs Hlth Syst Res Network, Hamilton, ON L8N 1G6, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Family Practice, Child & Family Res Inst, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[6] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Phys Educ, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
[7] St Josephs Healthcare Hamilton, Biostat Unit, Hamilton, ON L8N 4A6, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Ctr Hlth Econ & Policy Anal, Hlth Util Grp, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2010年 / 340卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
HOME VISITS; ELDERLY-PEOPLE; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; COMMUNITY; OUTCOMES; POPULATION; MANAGEMENT; PROMOTION; PROGRAM; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.c1480
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the impact of a provider initiated primary care outreach intervention compared with usual care among older adults at risk of functional decline. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Patients enrolled with 35 family physicians in five primary care networks in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Participants Patients were eligible if they were 75 years of age or older and were not receiving home care services. Of 3166 potentially eligible patients, 2662 (84%) completed the validated postal questionnaire used to determine risk of functional decline. Of 1724 patients who met the risk criteria, 769 (45%) agreed to participate and 719 were randomised. Intervention The 12 month intervention, provided by experienced home care nurses in 2004-6, consisted of a comprehensive initial assessment using the resident assessment instrument for home care; collaborative care planning with patients, their families, and family physicians; health promotion; and referral to community health and social support services. Main outcome measures Quality adjusted life years (QALYs), use and costs of health and social services, functional status, self rated health, and mortality. Results The mean difference in QALYs between intervention and control patients during the study period was not statistically significant (0.017, 95% confidence interval -0.022 to 0.056; P=0.388). The mean difference in overall cost of prescription drugs and services between the intervention and control groups was not statistically significant, (-$C165 (107; pound (sic)118; $162), 95% confidence interval -$C16 545 to $C16 214; P=0.984). Changes over 12 months in functional status and self rated health were not significantly different between the intervention and control groups. Ten patients died in each group. Conclusions The results of this study do not support adoption of this preventive primary care intervention for this target population of high risk older adults.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
AKKI S, 1991, J AM GERIATR SOC, V39, pA22
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1955, A million random digits with 100,000 normal deviates
[3]  
Bergman H, 2002, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V14, P223
[4]   Effects of intensive home visiting programs for older people with poor health status: A systematic review [J].
Bouman, Ans ;
van Rossum, Erik ;
Nelemans, Patricia ;
Kempen, Gertrudis I. J. M. ;
Knipschild, Paul .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2008, 8 (1)
[5]  
BROWNE G, 2001, 014 MCMAST U
[6]  
BROWNE G, 2001, HLTH SOCIAL SERVICE
[7]   A thorough going over: evidence for health assessments for older persons [J].
Byles, JE .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 24 (02) :117-123
[8]  
CADTH, 2017, Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada
[9]  
Coleman EA, 2002, AGING CLIN EXP RES, V14, P233
[10]  
Dalby DM, 2000, CAN MED ASSOC J, V162, P497