Shallow groundwater plays an important role in enhancing irrigation water productivity in an arid area: The perspective from a regional agricultural hydrology simulation

被引:39
作者
Gao, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Huo, Zailin [1 ]
Xu, Xu [1 ]
Qu, Zhongyi [2 ]
Huang, Guanhua [1 ]
Tang, Pengcheng [3 ]
Bai, Yining [4 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Ctr Agr Water Res China, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Agr Univ, Water Conservancy & Civil Engn Coll, Hohhot 010018, Peoples R China
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Inst Water Resources Pastoral Area, Hohhot 010020, Peoples R China
[4] New Mexico State Univ, Water Resources Res Inst, Las Cruces, NM 88001 USA
关键词
Irrigation area; Shallow groundwater; Agricultural hydrology modeling; Agricultural water productivity; YELLOW-RIVER BASIN; CROP PRODUCTION; USE EFFICIENCY; TABLE CONTRIBUTION; MODEL; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; WHEAT; SYSTEM; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.009
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Agricultural water productivity (WP) is an important indicator to evaluate the implementation of agricultural water saving in arid regions. However, the role of groundwater capillary rise to crop water use and WP is unclear at the regional scale, as the soil texture, irrigation amount, planting pattern and groundwater depth is various for different fields. Based on the calibrated Agricultural Water Productivity Management for Shallow Groundwater (AWPM-SG) model, a five-year regional WP and water budgets assessment was performed. The results showed that the groundwater contribution to crop evapotranspiration (ET) would be up to 65% with a groundwater depth of 1.0-1.5 m, but the agricultural productivity would be relatively low resulting from a waterlogged root zone. Additionally, deep groundwater could result in a reduced WP due to less capillary rise, while WP would be 2.02 and 1.98 kg/m(3) with groundwater depth of 2.5-3.0 m and 3.0-4.5 m under irrigation amount of 100-300 mm. Furthermore, limited irrigation can enhance the contribution of groundwater to WP and irrigation water productivity (IWP), which is significant with groundwater depth increasing. While the average IWP were 5.83, 3.62, 2.54 and 1.77 kg/m(3), respectively for irrigation amount of 100-300, 300-500, 500-700 and 700-900 mm and the average IWP decreased from 4.79 m to 3.18 kg/m(3) with groundwater depth increasing 0.5-1.0 m to 3.0-4.5 in. However, irrigation effective utilization (C-ieu,) was affected by groundwater depth weakly with irrigation water increasing. Furthermore, the optimal groundwater depth of 2.5-3.0 m was obtained by the impact of groundwater on irrigation water productivity (IWP) and C-ieu Thus at the regional scale, the spatial distribution of groundwater levels needs to be considered for making irrigation decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 58
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 56 FAO
[2]   A conceptual framework for the improvement of crop water productivity at different spatial scales [J].
Bouman, B. A. M. .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2007, 93 (1-3) :43-60
[3]   Extracting phreatic evaporation from remotely sensed maps of evapotranspiration [J].
Brunner, P. ;
Li, H. T. ;
Kinzelbach, W. ;
Li, W. P. ;
Dong, X. G. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (08)
[4]  
Cai L. G., 2003, WATER SAVING YELLOW, P13
[5]  
Campbell G.S., 1998, INTRO ENV BIOPHYSICS, P249
[6]  
Cox J. W., 2002, Regional water and soil assessment for managing sustainable agriculture in China and Australia, P70
[7]  
Cynthia R., 2014, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V111, P3268
[8]   Balancing water resource conservation and food security in China [J].
Dalin, Carole ;
Qiu, Huanguang ;
Hanasaki, Naota ;
Mauzerall, Denise L. ;
Rodriguez-Iturbe, Ignacio .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (15) :4588-4593
[9]  
Gao X. Y., 2017, SCI REP
[10]   Deficit irrigation enhances contribution of shallow groundwater to crop water consumption in arid area [J].
Gao, Xiaoyu ;
Bai, Yining ;
Huo, Zailin ;
Xu, Xu ;
Huang, Guanhua ;
Xia, Yuhong ;
Steenhuis, Tammo S. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 185 :116-125