Soil sample collection and analysis for the fugitive dust characterization study

被引:45
作者
Ashbaugh, LL
Carvacho, OF
Brown, MS
Chow, JC
Watson, JG
Magliano, KC
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Crocker Nucl Lab, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Desert Res Inst, Reno, NV 89512 USA
[3] Calif Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA 95812 USA
关键词
PM10; PM2.5; source profiles; soil dust; dust emission;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01022-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A unique set of soil samples was collected as part of the Fugitive Dust Characterization Study. The study was carried out to establish whether or not source profiles could be constructed using novel analytical methods that could distinguish soil dust sources from each other. The soil sources sampled included fields planted in cotton, almond, tomato, grape, and safflower, dairy and feedlot facilities, paved and unpaved roads (both urban and rural), an agricultural staging area, disturbed land with salt buildup, and construction areas where the topsoil had been removed. The samples were collected using a systematic procedure designed to reduce sampling bias, and were stored frozen to preserve possible organic signatures. For this paper the samples were characterized by particle size (percent sand, silt, and clay), dry silt content (used in EPA-recommended fugitive dust emission factors), carbon and nitrogen content, and potential to emit both PM10 and PM2.5. These are not the "novel analytical methods" referred to above; rather, it was the basic characterization of the samples to use in comparing analytical methods by other scientists contracted to the California Air Resources Board. The purpose of this paper is to document the methods used to collect the samples, the collection locations, the analysis of soil type and potential to emit PM10, and the sample variability, both within field and between fields of the same crop type. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1173
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Ahuja M.S., 1989, Transactions: Receptor Models in Air Resources Management, P145
[2]  
*ASTM, 1984, C13695A ASTM
[3]   Spatial representativeness and scales of transport during the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study in California's San Joaquin Valley [J].
Blanchard, CL ;
Carr, EL ;
Collins, JF ;
Smith, TB ;
Lehrman, DE ;
Michaels, HM .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (29) :4775-4786
[4]  
Carvacho OF, 2001, T ASAE, V44, P1603, DOI 10.13031/2013.7046
[5]  
Chow J. C., 1997, TECHNICAL SUPPORT ST
[6]   PM10 SOURCE APPORTIONMENT IN CALIFORNIA SAN-JOAQUIN VALLEY [J].
CHOW, JC ;
WATSON, JG ;
LOWENTHAL, DH ;
SOLOMON, PA ;
MAGLIANO, KL ;
ZIMAN, SD ;
RICHARDS, LW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (18) :3335-3354
[7]   Descriptive analysis of PM(2.5) and PM(10) at regionally representative locations during SJVAQS/AUSPEX [J].
Chow, JC ;
Watson, JG ;
Lu, ZQ ;
Lowenthal, DH ;
Frazier, CA ;
Solomon, PA ;
Thuillier, RH ;
Magliano, K .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 30 (12) :2079-2112
[8]   A NEIGHBORHOOD-SCALE STUDY OF PM-10 SOURCE CONTRIBUTIONS IN RUBIDOUX, CALIFORNIA [J].
CHOW, JC ;
LIU, CS ;
CASSMASSI, J ;
WATSON, JG ;
LU, ZQ ;
PRITCHETT, LC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (04) :693-706
[9]   PM(10) AND PM(2.5) COMPOSITIONS IN CALIFORNIA SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY [J].
CHOW, JC ;
WATSON, JG ;
LOWENTHAL, DH ;
SOLOMON, PA ;
MAGLIANO, KL ;
ZIMAN, SD ;
RICHARDS, LW .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 18 (02) :105-128
[10]  
FLOCCHINI RG, 1994, EVALUATION EMISSIONS