Comparison and assimilation of global soil moisture retrievals from the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E) and the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR)

被引:294
作者
Reichle, Rolf H.
Koster, Randal D.
Liu, Ping
Mahanama, Sarith P. P.
Njoku, Eni G.
Owe, Manfred
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Global Modeling & Assimilat Off, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Hydrol Sci Branch, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, Baltimore, MD 21228 USA
[5] Sci Applicat Int Corp, Beltsville, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2006JD008033
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] Two data sets of satellite surface soil moisture retrievals are first compared and then assimilated into the NASA Catchment land surface model. The first satellite data set is derived from 4 years of X-band (10.7 GHz) passive microwave brightness temperature observations by the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for the Earth Observing System (AMSR-E), and the second is from 9 years of C-band (6.6 GHz) brightness temperature observations by the Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (SMMR). Despite the similarity in the satellite instruments, the retrieved soil moisture data exhibit very large differences in their multiyear means and temporal variability, primarily because they are computed with different retrieval algorithms. The satellite retrievals are also compared to a soil moisture product generated by the NASA Catchment land surface model when driven with surface meteorological data derived from observations. The climatologies of both satellite data sets are different from those of the model products. Prior to assimilation of the satellite retrievals into the land model, satellite-model biases are removed by scaling the satellite retrievals into the land model's climatology through matching of the respective cumulative distribution functions. Validation against in situ data shows that for both data sets the soil moisture fields from the assimilation are superior to either satellite data or model data alone. A global analysis of the innovations ( defined as the difference between the observations and the corresponding model values prior to the assimilation update) reveals how changes in model and observations error parameters may enhance filter performance in future experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Development of a hydrometeorological forcing data set for global soil moisture estimation [J].
Berg, AA ;
Famiglietti, JS ;
Rodell, M ;
Reichle, RH ;
Jambor, U ;
Holl, SL ;
Houser, PR .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2005, 25 (13) :1697-1714
[2]  
Betts AK, 1998, J ATMOS SCI, V55, P1091, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<1091:FSCASA>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Bloom S., 2005, TECH REP SER GLOBAL, V26
[5]   Impact of incorrect model error assumptions on the sequential assimilation of remotely sensed surface soil moisture [J].
Crow, Wade T. ;
Van Loon, Emiel .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) :421-432
[6]   The assimilation of remotely sensed soil brightness temperature imagery into a land surface model using Ensemble Kalman filtering: a case study based on ESTAR measurements during SGP97 [J].
Crow, WT ;
Wood, EF .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2003, 26 (02) :137-149
[7]  
De Jeu R.A.M., 2003, THESIS VRIJE U AMSTE
[8]  
DEE DP, 1995, MON WEATHER REV, V123, P1128, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<1128:OLEOEC>2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
Dirmeyer PA, 2003, J HYDROMETEOROL, V4, P599, DOI 10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<0599:TROTLS>2.0.CO