Endoscopic detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus using light-scattering spectroscopy

被引:203
作者
Wallace, MB
Perelman, LT
Backman, V
Crawford, JM
Fitzmaurice, M
Seiler, M
Badizadegan, K
Shields, SJ
Itzkan, I
Dasari, RR
Van Dam, J
Feld, MS
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] W Roxbury VA Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol, W Roxbury, MA USA
[3] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[4] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] MIT, GR Harrison Spect Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/gast.2000.16511
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: We conducted a study to assess the potential of light-scattering spectroscopy (LSS), which can measure epithelial nuclear enlargement and crowding, for in situ detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus, Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected Barrett's esophagus underwent endoscopy and systematic biopsy, Before biopsy, each site was sampled by LSS using a fiberoptic probe. Diffusely reflected white light was spectrally analyzed to obtain the size distribution of cell nuclei in the mucosal layer, from which the percentage of enlarged nuclei and the degree of crowding were determined, Dysplasia was assigned if more than 30% of the nuclei exceeded 10 mu m and the histologic findings compared with those of 4 pathologists blinded to the light-scattering assessment, The data were then retrospectively analyzed to further explore the diagnostic potential of LSS, Results: Seventy-six sites from 13 patients were sampled. All abnormal sites and a random sample of nondysplastic sites were reviewed by the pathologists, The average diagnoses were 4 sites from 4 different patients as high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 8 sites from 5 different patients as low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 12 as indefinite for dysplasia, and 52 as nondysplastic Barrett's, The sensitivity and specificity of LSS for detecting dysplasia (either LGD or HGD) were 90% and 90%, respectively, with all HGD and 87% of LGD sites correctly classified. Decision algorithms using both nuclear enlargement and crowding further improved diagnostic accuracy, and accurately classified samples into the 4 histologic categories. Conclusions: LSS can reliably detect LGD and HGD in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 682
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
ANTONIOLI D, 1993, PATHOLOGY INCIPIENT, P64
[2]   RISING INCIDENCE OF ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AND GASTRIC CARDIA [J].
BLOT, WJ ;
DEVESA, SS ;
KNELLER, RW ;
FRAUMENI, JF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (10) :1287-1289
[3]   Methylene blue selectively stains intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus [J].
Canto, MIF ;
Setrakian, S ;
Petras, RE ;
Blades, E ;
Chak, A ;
Sivak, MV .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 44 (01) :1-7
[4]   Surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus for dysplasia and cancer with balloon cytology [J].
Falk, GW ;
Chittajallu, R ;
Goldblum, JR ;
Biscotti, CV ;
Geisinger, KR ;
Petras, RE ;
Birgisson, S ;
Rice, TW ;
Richter, JE .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1997, 112 (06) :1787-1797
[5]   DISCORDANCE BETWEEN FLOW CYTOMETRIC ABNORMALITIES AND DYSPLASIA IN BARRETTS ESOPHAGUS [J].
FENNERTY, MB ;
SAMPLINER, RE ;
WAY, D ;
RIDDELL, R ;
STEINBRONN, K ;
GAREWAL, HS .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1989, 97 (04) :815-820
[6]  
HAGGITT RC, 1988, AM J PATHOL, V131, P53
[7]   BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS, DYSPLASIA, AND ADENOCARCINOMA [J].
HAGGITT, RC .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1994, 25 (10) :982-993
[8]   VALUE OF DNA IMAGE CYTOMETRY IN THE PREDICTION OF MALIGNANT CHANGE IN BARRETTS ESOPHAGUS [J].
JAMES, PD ;
ATKINSON, M .
GUT, 1989, 30 (07) :899-905
[9]  
Kleinbaum DG., 2007, Applied Regression Analysis and Multivariable Methods, V4th ed
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174