DNA adduct measurements, cell proliferation and tumor mutation induction in relation to tumor formation in B6C3F1 mice fed coal tar or benzo[a]pyrene

被引:46
作者
Culp, SJ
Warbritton, AR
Smith, BA
Li, EE
Beland, FA
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, HFT 110, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
[2] Pathol Assoc Int, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/carcin/21.7.1433
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Coal tar is a complex mixture containing hundreds of compounds, at least 30 of which are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, including the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), Although humans are exposed to complex mixtures on a daily basis, the synergistic or individual effects of components within a mixture on the carcinogenic process remain unclear, We have compared DNA adduct formation and cell proliferation in mice fed coal tar or BaP for 4 weeks with tumor formation in a 2 year chronic feeding study. Additionally, we have analyzed tumor DNA for mutations in the K-ras, H-ras and p53 genes, In the forestomach of mice fed either coal tar or BaP an adduct indicative of BaP was detected, with adduct levels increasing in a dose-responsive manner, K-ms mutations were detected in the forestomach tumors, with the incidence being similar in mice fed coal tar or BaP, These results suggest that the BaP within coal tar is associated with forestomach tumor induction in coal tarfed mice. DNA adduct levels in the small intestine were not predictive of tumor incidence in this tissue; instead, the tumors appeared to result from compound-induced cell proliferation at high doses of coal tar. K-rns mutations were detected in lung tumors. Since lung tumors were not increased by BaP, coal tar components other than BaP appear to be responsible for the tumors induced in this tissue. N-ras mutations, primarily occurring at codon 61, were the most common mutation observed in liver tumors induced by coal tar. Since this mutation profile is observed in spontaneous hepatic tumors, components in the coal tar may be promoting the expansion of pre-existing lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1440
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF THE GENE CODING FOR THE MURINE CELLULAR TUMOR-ANTIGEN P53 [J].
BIENZ, B ;
ZAKUTHOURI, R ;
GIVOL, D ;
OREN, M .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1984, 3 (09) :2179-2183
[2]   ALLELE-SPECIFIC ACTIVATION AND EXPRESSION OF THE K-RAS GENE IN HYBRID MOUSE LUNG-TUMORS INDUCED BY CHEMICAL CARCINOGENS [J].
CHEN, B ;
YOU, L ;
WANG, Y ;
STONER, GD ;
YOU, M .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1994, 15 (09) :2031-2035
[3]   p53, mutation frequency and apoptosis in the murine small intestine [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Howard, LA ;
Harrison, DJ ;
Winton, DJ .
ONCOGENE, 1997, 14 (17) :2015-2018
[4]   EXPRESSION OF GLYCOLIPID RECEPTORS TO SHIGA-LIKE TOXIN ON HUMAN LYMPHOCYTE-B - A MECHANISM FOR THE FAILURE OF LONG-LIVED ANTIBODY-RESPONSE TO DYSENTERIC DISEASE [J].
COHEN, A ;
MADRIDMARINA, V ;
ESTROV, Z ;
FREEDMAN, MH ;
LINGWOOD, CA ;
DOSCH, HM .
INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 2 (01) :1-8
[5]   RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON HIGH-DOSE ANIMAL EXPOSURE EXPERIMENTS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
ELLWEIN, LB .
CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 5 (06) :742-748
[6]   RELATIONSHIP OF DNA-ADDUCTS DERIVED FROM 2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE TO CELL-PROLIFERATION AND THE INDUCTION OF RODENT LIVER AND BLADDER-TUMORS [J].
COHEN, SM ;
ELLWEIN, LB .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1995, 23 (02) :136-142
[7]   A comparison of the tumors induced by coal tar and benzo[a]pyrene in a 2-year bioassay [J].
Culp, SJ ;
Gaylor, DW ;
Sheldon, WG ;
Goldstein, LS ;
Beland, FA .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1998, 19 (01) :117-124
[8]   BIPHASIC REMOVAL OF DNA ADDUCTS IN A REPETITIVE DNA-SEQUENCE AFTER DIETARY ADMINISTRATION OF 2-ACETYLAMINOFLUORENE [J].
CULP, SJ ;
POIRIER, MC ;
BELAND, FA .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1993, 99 :273-275
[9]   COMPARISON OF DNA ADDUCT FORMATION IN MICE FED COAL-TAR OR BENZO[A]PYRENE [J].
CULP, SJ ;
BELAND, FA .
CARCINOGENESIS, 1994, 15 (02) :247-252
[10]   Cell proliferation rates in common cancer target tissues of B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats: Effects of age, gender, and choice of marker [J].
Eldridge, SR ;
Goldsworthy, SM .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1996, 32 (02) :159-167