An improved automated ECG algorithm for detecting acute and prior myocardial infarction

被引:8
作者
Andresen, A
Dalla Gasperina, M
Myers, R
Wagner, GS
Warner, RA
Selvester, RHS
机构
[1] Inovise Med Inc, Newberg, OR 97132 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[3] Long Beach Mem Med Ctr, Long Beach, CA USA
关键词
ECG interpretation; acute myocardial infarction; myocardial infarction; ECG criteria;
D O I
10.1054/jelc.2002.37162
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Commercial electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithms for detection of prior myocardial infarction (MI) predominantly rely on QRS criteria and on established qualitative ST and T changes. The qualitative approach to ST-T changes in Cardiovise 2.5 is improved upon in version 3.0 with two distinct new approaches for quantifying ST and T changes to assist with the detection of prior MI. The first method uses the mean axes of vectorcardiographic T-loops taken from the inverse Dower transform of the 12-lead ECG to indicate ischemic regions of the left ventricular wall. The second method establishes regional scores for residual ST elevation supportive of ischemia or infarction. These 2 ST-T measures qualify borderline QRS infarct criteria, resulting in composite criteria having higher sensitivities and specificities than QRS criteria alone. Comparative results were created by studying an MI positive group of 360 patients with biochemical marker evidence for infarction and an MI negative group of 515 patients negative for risk factors, biochemical markers and/or coronary disease or wall motion abnormality. Three automated ECG methods that rely predominantly on QRS markers for infarction are compared to Cardiovise (CV) prior MI algorithm version 3.0: Carchovise 3.0 also introduces criteria for detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Two automated ECG methods are compared to Cardiovise for the detection and labeling of ST elevation (STE) AMI, and for detection of non-STE AMI.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 110
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF A QRS SCORING SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING MYOCARDIAL INFARCT SIZE .6. IDENTIFICATION OF SCREENING CRITERIA FOR NON-ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTS [J].
ANDERSON, WD ;
WAGNER, NB ;
LEE, KL ;
WHITE, RD ;
YUSCHAK, J ;
BEHAR, VS ;
SELVESTER, RH ;
IDEKER, RE ;
WAGNER, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 61 (10) :729-733
[2]   Validation of advanced ECG diagnostic software for the detection of prior myocardial infarction by using nuclear cardiac imaging [J].
Andresen, A ;
Dobkin, J ;
Maynard, C ;
Myers, R ;
Wagner, GS ;
Warner, RA ;
Selvester, RHS .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2001, 34 :243-248
[3]  
Dower G E, 1968, J Electrocardiol, V1, P101
[4]   EVALUATION OF A QRS SCORING SYSTEM FOR ESTIMATING MYOCARDIAL INFARCT SIZE .5. SPECIFICITY AND METHOD OF APPLICATION OF THE COMPLETE SYSTEM [J].
HINDMAN, NB ;
SCHOCKEN, DD ;
WIDMANN, M ;
ANDERSON, WD ;
WHITE, RD ;
LEGGETT, S ;
IDEKER, RE ;
HINOHARA, T ;
SELVESTER, RH ;
WAGNER, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1985, 55 (13) :1485-1490
[5]   COMPARATIVE ACCURACY OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND VECTORCARDIOGRAPHIC CRITERIA FOR INFERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
HURD, HP ;
STARLING, MR ;
CRAWFORD, MH ;
DLABAL, PW ;
OROURKE, RA .
CIRCULATION, 1981, 63 (05) :1025-1029
[6]   PHYSICIAN ELECTROCARDIOGRAM READING IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT - ACCURACY AND EFFECT ON TRIAGE DECISIONS - FINDINGS FROM A MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
JAYES, RL ;
LARSEN, GC ;
BESHANSKY, JR ;
DAGOSTINO, RB ;
SELKER, HP .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 7 (04) :387-392
[7]  
Kannel W B, 1986, Cardiol Clin, V4, P583
[8]  
KANNEL WB, 1990, ADV CARDIOL, V37, P202
[9]  
Morey SS, 2000, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V61, P1901
[10]   Comparison of the various electrocardiographic scoring codes for estimating anatomically documented sizes of single and multiple infarcts of the left ventricle [J].
Pahlm, US ;
Chaitman, BR ;
Rautaharju, PM ;
Selvester, RH ;
Wagner, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 81 (07) :809-815