Costs and benefits of on-farm nature conservation

被引:13
作者
Berentsen, Paul B. M.
Hendriksen, Astrid
Heijman, Wim J. M.
van Vlokhoven, Haske A.
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Business Econ Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Environm Policy Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Econ Consumers & Householders Grp, NL-6700 EW Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
on-farm nature conservation; landscape conservation; agriculture; dairy farming; farm modeling; survey;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.026
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The costs of on-farm nature conservation is an important issue in Dutch agriculture. As nature is a public good, nature conservation cannot do without subsidies from the government. The question of how much farmers should receive in subsidies in order to keep farms engaged in conservation activities is highly topical. In this article, the questions of how much farmers should receive in subsidies and what other factors motivate or demotivate farmers to participate in on-farm nature conservation are addressed. The study was carried out for a particular region in the northern Netherlands and was initiated by the concerns that farmers organisations had about the level of subsidies for landscape conservation as a major form of nature conservation on dairy farms in this region. In this study, both a normative model and a survey were employed. A normative economic dairy farm model was first used to determine differences in income between a typical farm involved in landscape conservation and a typical farm not involved in landscape conservation. Results from the model show that the farm involved in conservation earned a lower income than the farm not involved in conservation. This was due to the first farmer's smaller scale, lower intensity and lower productivity. The lower income, however, was compensated for by conservation subsidies. Next, a survey concerning on-farm nature conservation in general was carried out among the farmers in this area. From the survey results, it appeared that the majority of the respondents were satisfied, at least to some extent, with the level of subsidies for on-farm nature conservation. Moreover, the survey also revealed that the farmers' commitment to their natural environment strongly motivates farmers to get involved in on-farm nature conservation schemes, whereas the uncertainty about regulations and the feeling of being controlled too much demotivate them. The results show the complementarity of the two methods. The findings of the survey confirm the main findings of the normative model calculations, and, moreover, the survey reveals that in addition to monetary compensation, other factors play a role for farmers in the decision to get involved in on-farm nature conservation. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 579
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AGR MEAS OV GEN PRIN
[2]  
BALKTHEUWS LW, 2004, STAD OMMELAND ACTORE, V14
[3]   AN ENVIRONMENTAL-ECONOMIC MODEL AT FARM-LEVEL TO ANALYZE INSTITUTIONAL AND TECHNICAL CHANGE IN DAIRY FARMING [J].
BERENTSEN, PBM ;
GIESEN, GWJ .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1995, 49 (02) :153-175
[4]  
BOARDMAN A, 2001, COST BENEFIT ANAL
[5]   The environmental supply of farm households - A flexible willingness to accept model [J].
Dupraz, P ;
Vermersch, D ;
De Frahan, BH ;
Delvaux, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (02) :171-189
[6]  
DUPRAZ P, 2006, EC IMPLICATIONS SCAL
[7]  
FISH R, 2003, ECOLOGICAL EC, V48, P395
[8]  
Hazell P.B.R., 1986, Mathematical Programming for Economic Analysis in Agriculture
[9]   An economic approach for a better understanding of conflicts between farmers and nature conservationists -: an application of the decision support system MODAM to the Lower Odra Valley National Park [J].
Kächele, H ;
Dabbert, S .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2002, 74 (02) :241-255
[10]  
*LEI, 2006, FADN DAT SEV YEARS