Structural basis for different inhibitory specificities of human cystatins C and D

被引:50
作者
Hall, A
Ekiel, I
Mason, RW
Kasprzykowski, F
Grubb, A
Abrahamson, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lund Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, Inst Lab Med, S-22185 Lund, Sweden
[2] Natl Res Council Canada, Biotechnol Res Inst, Pharmaceut Biotechnol Sector, Biomol NMR Lab, Montreal, PQ H4P 2R2, Canada
[3] Montreal Joint Ctr Struct Biol, Montreal, PQ H4P 2R2, Canada
[4] Nemours Res Programs, Div Dev Biol, Wilmington, DE 19899 USA
[5] Univ Gdansk, Dept Chem, PL-80952 Gdansk, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1021/bi971197j
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Human cystatins C and D share almost identical primary structures of two out of the three segments proposed to be of importance for enzyme interactions but have markedly different profiles for inhibition of the target cysteine peptidases, cathepsins B, H, L. and S. binding regions of the inhibitors are responsible for the different inhibition profiles, and thereby confer biological selectivity, two hybrid cystatins were produced in Escherichia coli expression systems. In one hybrid, the N-terminal segment of cystatin C was placed on the framework of cystatin D, and the second was engineered with the N-terminal segment of cystatin D on the cystatin C scaffold. Truncated cystatin C and D variants, devoid of their N-terminal segments, were obtained by incubation with glycyl endopeptidase and isolated, in a second approach to assess the importance of the N-terminal binding regions for cystatin function and specificity. The affinities of the four cystatin variants for cathepsins B, H, L, and S were measured. By comparison with corresponding results for wild-type cystatins C and D, it was concluded (1) that both the N-terminal and framework part of the molecules significantly contribute to the observed differences in inhibitory activities of cystatins C and D and (2) that the N-terminal segment of cystatin C increases the inhibitory activity of cystatin D against cathepsin S and cathepsin L but results in decreased activity against cathepsin H. These differences in specificity were explained by the residues interacting with the S? subsite of peptidases (Val- and Ala-10 in cystatin C and D, respectively). Also, nt results in total loss of enzyme affinity for cystatin D but not for cystatin C. Therefore, structural differences in the framework parts, as well as in the N-terminal segments, are critical for both inhibitory specificity and potency. Homology modeling was used to identify residues likely responsible for the gnerally reduced inhgiitory potency of cystatin D.
引用
收藏
页码:4071 / 4079
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   INCREASED BODY-TEMPERATURE ACCELERATES AGGREGATION OF THE LEU-68 -] GLN MUTANT CYSTATIN-C, THE AMYLOID-FORMING PROTEIN IN HEREDITARY CYSTATIN-C AMYLOID ANGIOPATHY [J].
ABRAHAMSON, M ;
GRUBB, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1994, 91 (04) :1416-1420
[2]   EFFICIENT PRODUCTION OF NATIVE, BIOLOGICALLY-ACTIVE HUMAN CYSTATIN-C BY ESCHERICHIA-COLI [J].
ABRAHAMSON, M ;
DALBOGE, H ;
OLAFSSON, I ;
CARLSEN, S ;
GRUBB, A .
FEBS LETTERS, 1988, 236 (01) :14-18
[3]  
ABRAHAMSON M, 1987, J BIOL CHEM, V262, P9688
[4]  
ABRAHAMSON M, 1994, METHOD ENZYMOL, V244, P685
[5]   STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSION OF THE HUMAN CYSTATIN-C GENE [J].
ABRAHAMSON, M ;
OLAFSSON, I ;
PALSDOTTIR, A ;
ULVSBACK, M ;
LUNDWALL, A ;
JENSSON, O ;
GRUBB, A .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 268 (02) :287-294
[6]  
ABRAHAMSON M, 1986, J BIOL CHEM, V261, P1282
[7]   RECOMBINANT CHICKEN EGG-WHITE CYSTATIN VARIANTS OF THE QLVSG REGION [J].
AUERSWALD, EA ;
GENENGER, G ;
ASSFALGMACHLEIDT, I ;
MACHLEIDT, W ;
ENGH, RA ;
FRITZ, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1992, 209 (03) :837-845
[8]  
BALBIN M, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P23156
[9]  
BARRETT AJ, 1981, METHOD ENZYMOL, V80, P535
[10]   The importance of the second hairpin loop of cystatin C for proteinase binding, characterization of the interaction of Trp-106 variants of the inhibitor with cysteine proteinases [J].
Bjork, I ;
Brieditis, I ;
RaubSegall, E ;
Pol, E ;
Hakansson, K ;
Abrahamson, M .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 35 (33) :10720-10726