Organizational rules and the "bureaucratic personality"

被引:68
作者
Bozeman, B [1 ]
Rainey, HG
机构
[1] Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2991751
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Theory: Theories of the bureaucratic personality by Victor Thompson and Robert Merton hold that personal characteristics of certain bureaucrats make them prefer elaborate rules and regulations, so this study tests such a model. Yet some organizations really do need more rules, so the study also tests a bureaucratic organization model that predicts that characteristics of the organization determine members' preferences for rules. Prominent theories of bureaucracy also suggest that bureaucratic personalities should be more prevalent in public bureaucracies. Hypotheses: Personal characteristics of organizational managers determine their preferences for more rules, so managers higher on alienation and pessimism will perceive a need for more rules. Alternatively, organizational characteristics (such as layers of authority and number of records kept) determine managers' preferences for more rules, so that where there are low levels of such structural characteristics (e.g., few records kept), managers will perceive a need for more rules. Public sector managers should show more of the bureaucratic personality responses than private managers, and prefer more rules. Methods: Correlation and logistic regression analysis is used on data from the National Administrative Studies Project, a mail survey of managers in a wide variety of public and private organizations. Results: Both personal characteristics, such as alienation, and organizational characteristics, such as the number of records kept, show relations to preferences for more rules. Contrary to expectations and to much of the literature, managers in private organizations (mostly business firms) were more likely to prefer more rules than managers in public agencies.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 189
页数:27
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
ALLINSON CW, 1984, BUREAUCRATIC PERSONA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1961, Modern organization
[3]   TOLERANCE FOR BUREAUCRATIC STRUCTURE - THEORY AND MEASUREMENT [J].
BAKER, SH ;
ETZIONI, A ;
HANSEN, RA ;
SONTAG, M .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1973, 26 (06) :775-786
[4]  
Baldwin J. N., 1990, American Review of Public Administration, V20, P7, DOI 10.1177/027507409002000102
[5]  
Blake R.R., 1964, MANAGERIAL GRID
[6]   RED TAPE AND TASK DELAYS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BOZEMAN, B ;
REED, PN ;
SCOTT, P .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 1992, 24 (03) :290-322
[7]   SECTOR CONTEXT AND PERFORMANCE - A COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIAL AND GOVERNMENT RESEARCH UNITS [J].
BOZEMAN, B ;
LOVELESS, S .
ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 1987, 19 (02) :197-235
[8]  
Bozeman B., 1994, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, P197, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A037204
[9]  
Bozeman B., 1991, J TECHNOLOGY TRANSFE, V16, P29, DOI [10.1007/BF02371354, DOI 10.1007/BF02371354]
[10]  
BRETON A, 1972, LOGIC BUREAUCRATIC C