Cosmic velocity fields and their interpretation

被引:4
作者
Davis, M
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Phys, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.95.1.78
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We review the current status of our knowledge of cosmic velocity fields, on both small and large scales. A new statistic is described that characterizes the incoherent, thermal component of the velocity field on scales less than 2h(-1) Mpc (h is H-0/100 km.s(-1).Mpc(-1), where H-0 is the Hubble constant and 1 Mpc = 3.09 X 10(22) m) and smaller. The derived velocity is found to be quite stable across different catalogs and is of remarkably low amplitude, consistent with an effective Ohm similar to 0.15 on this scale, We advocate the use of this statistic as a standard diagnostic of the small-scale kinetic energy of the galaxy distribution. The analysis of large-scale flows probes the velocity field on scales of 10-60 h(-1) Mpc and should be adequately described by linear perturbation theory, Recent work has focused on the comparison of gravity or density fields derived from whole-sky redshift surveys of galaxies [e.g., the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS)] with velocity fields derived from a variety of sources. All the algorithms that directly compare the gravity and velocity fields suggest low values of the density parameter, while the POTENT analysis, using the same data but comparing the derived IRAS galaxy density field with the Mark-III derived matter density field, leads to much higher estimates of the inferred density. Since the IRAS and Mark-III fields are not fully consistent with each other, the present discrepancies might result from the very different weighting applied to the data in the competing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 81
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bartlett JG, 1996, ASTRON ASTROPHYS, V307, P1
[2]   THE VELOCITY-DISTANCE RELATION FOR GALAXIES ON A BUBBLE [J].
BOTHUN, GD ;
GELLER, MJ ;
KURTZ, MJ ;
HUCHRA, JP ;
SCHILD, RE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 395 (02) :347-359
[3]  
DACOSTA L, 1997, ASTROPH9707299
[4]   Comparison of velocity and gravity fields: The Mark III Tully-Fisher catalog versus the IRAS 1.2 Jy survey [J].
Davis, M ;
Nusser, A ;
Willick, JA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 473 (01) :22-41
[5]   A SURVEY OF GALAXY REDSHIFTS .5. THE 2-POINT POSITION AND VELOCITY CORRELATIONS [J].
DAVIS, M ;
PEEBLES, PJE .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 267 (02) :465-482
[6]  
DAVIS M, 1997, ASTROPH9705224
[7]  
DEKEL A, 1994, ANNU REV ASTRON ASTR, V32, P371
[8]  
DEKEL A, 1997, ASTROPH9705033
[9]   THE IRAS 1.2 JY SURVEY - REDSHIFT DATA [J].
FISHER, KB ;
HUCHRA, JP ;
STRAUSS, MA ;
DAVIS, M ;
YAHIL, A ;
SCHLEGEL, D .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1995, 100 (01) :69-103
[10]   The Local Group as a test of cosmological models [J].
Governato, F ;
Moore, B ;
Cen, RY ;
Stadel, J ;
Lake, G ;
Quinn, T .
NEW ASTRONOMY, 1997, 2 (02) :91-106