Ozone and sulfur dioxide dry deposition to forests: Observations and model evaluation

被引:91
作者
Finkelstein, PL
Ellestad, TG
Clarke, JF
Meyers, TP
Schwede, DB
Hebert, EO
Neal, JA
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Exposure Res Lab, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
[2] NOAA, Atmospher Sci Modeling Div, Air Resources Lab, Atmospher Turbulence & Diffus Div, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
[3] Environm Sci & Engn Inc, Gainesville, FL 32607 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JD900185
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Fluxes and deposition velocities of O-3 and SO2 were measured over both a deciduous and a mixed coniferous-deciduous forest for full growing seasons. Fluxes and deposition velocities of O-3 were measured over a coniferous forest for a month. Mean deposition velocities of 0.35 to 0.48 cm/s for O-3 and 0.6 to 0.72 cm/s for SO2 were observed during the growing seasons of 1997 and 1998. Weekly averages of O-3 deposition velocity ranged from 0.25 cm/s at the beginning and end of the season to 1.25 cm/s in late June. SO2 had a smaller seasonal variation, from 0.75 to 1.5 cm/s between the beginning and peak of the season. Because O-3 concentrations are higher, the flux of O-3 to forests is considerably greater than the flux of SO2. Daytime deposition velocities are very similar at each site, from 0.75 to 0.79 cm/s for O-3, and from 1.01 to 1.04 cm/s for SO2. Diurnal cycles for both gases are discussed, as are the impact of some weather events. The peak time for O-3 deposition velocity is in midmorning, while it is near midday for SO2. Surface wetness is usually associated with a small increase in deposition velocity, but for some rain events a major increase was noted. Minimum deposition velocities usually occur at night and increase slowly in the predawn hours before light. Comparisons are made between observations of deposition velocity and predictions made with the Meyers multilayer deposition velocity model. While the model is, on average, unbiased for O-3, it tends to underpredict the higher deposition velocity values. The model is slightly biased low (underpredicts) for SO2 deposition velocity. The strengths of the model are noted, as are opportunities for improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:15365 / 15377
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aurela Mika, 1996, Silva Fennica, V30, P97
[2]  
BANNISTER P, 1976, INTRO PHYSL PLANT EC
[3]   A COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FOREST CANOPY LEAF-AREA [J].
CHASON, JW ;
BALDOCCHI, DD ;
HUSTON, MA .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1991, 57 (1-3) :107-128
[4]   Dry deposition calculations for the clean air status and trends network [J].
Clarke, JF ;
Edgerton, ES ;
Martin, BE .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 31 (21) :3667-3678
[5]   CANOPY SCALE MEASUREMENTS OF STOMATAL AND CUTICULAR O-3 UPTAKE BY SITKA SPRUCE [J].
COE, H ;
GALLAGHER, MW ;
CHOULARTON, TW ;
DORE, C .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 29 (12) :1413-1423
[6]  
DAVIES WJ, 1995, ECOPHYSIOLOGY CONIFE, P63
[7]   Exchange of ozone and nitrogen oxides between the atmosphere and coniferous forest [J].
Duyzer, J ;
Weststrate, H ;
Walton, S .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 85 (04) :2065-2070
[8]   A COMPARISON OF OPTICAL AND DIRECT-METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FOLIAGE SURFACE-AREA INDEX IN FORESTS [J].
FASSNACHT, KS ;
GOWER, ST ;
NORMAN, JM ;
MCMURTRIE, RE .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1994, 71 (1-2) :183-207
[9]   OZONE DEPOSITION ONTO A DECIDUOUS FOREST DURING DRY AND WET CONDITIONS [J].
FUENTES, JD ;
GILLESPIE, TJ ;
DENHARTOG, G ;
NEUMANN, HH .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1992, 62 (1-2) :1-18
[10]   SULFUR UPTAKE FROM THE ATMOSPHERE BY FOREST AND FARMLAND [J].
GALBALLY, IE ;
GARLAND, JA ;
WILSON, MJG .
NATURE, 1979, 280 (5717) :49-50