Evaluation of high-flux hemodiafiltration efficiency using an on-line urea monitor

被引:25
作者
Canaud, B [1 ]
Bosc, JY
Leblanc, M
Garred, LJ
Vo, T
Mion, C
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Lapeyronie Hosp, Div Nephrol, F-34295 Montpellier, France
[2] Lakehead Univ, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
关键词
adequacy; dialysis dose; effluent dialysate; protein catabolic rate; urea kinetics;
D O I
10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9428455
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
On-line urea monitoring of the effluent dialysate offers a real-time assessment of dialysis efficiency and metabolic/nutritional characteristics of hemodialysis patients. Quantitative parameters were evaluated by dialysate urea kinetic modeling (DUKM) with an on-line urea sensor in 23 patients treated by high-flux hemodiafiltration (HDF) (215 sessions of 210 to 240 minutes with a mean blood flow rate of 367 +/- 44 mL/min). Overall, the mean effective Kt/V was 1.52 +/- 0.29, the urea mass removed (22.8 +/- 5.5 g/session or 814 +/- 198 mmol/session), the solute removal index (SRI) 73% +/- 6.1%, and the mean normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), 1.15 +/- 0.31 g/kg/day. Blood urea kinetic modeling (BUKM), based on pre-and postsession urea concentrations, using equations from Daugirdas and Garred to calculate equilibrated Kt/V and nPCR, respectively, were in good agreement with DUKM, the differences observed appearing not clinically relevant. The variability of evaluated parameters was verified over consecutive sessions for a mean period of 3 weeks in the entire group. Mean variation in Kt/V was 8%; in urea mass removal, 18%; and in nPCR, 18%. When assessed over 1 week in a subgroup of 13 patients, Kt/V and PCR remained relatively stable, and urea mass removal per-and postsession declined from 23.5 +/- 8.0 g (840 +/- 285 mmol) to 18.7 +/- 6.3 g (667 +/- 225 mmol) from the first to the third session of the week, most likely as a consequence of interdialytic intervals. Predialysis urea concentrations followed the same trend. In the current study, DUKM with on-line urea sensor has confirmed that HDF is a highly efficient renal replacement modality; the variability observed in quantitative parameters supports a need for frequent adequacy monitoring. On-line urea monitoring of effluent dialysate is a simple device that provides the opportunity to tailor treatment to patient needs. (C) 1998 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Aebischer P, 1985, Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs, V31, P338
[2]   Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement [J].
Argiles, A ;
Ficheux, A ;
Thomas, M ;
Bosc, JY ;
Kerr, PG ;
Lorho, R ;
Flavier, JL ;
Stec, F ;
Adele, C ;
Leblanc, M ;
Garred, LJ ;
Canaud, B ;
Mion, H ;
Mion, CM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 52 (02) :530-537
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Accuracy of an on-line urea monitor compared with urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification [J].
Bosticardo, G.M. ;
Avalle, U. ;
Giacchino, F. ;
Molino, A. ;
Alloatti, S. .
1600, J.B. Lippincott Co, Hagerstown, MD, United States (40)
[5]  
CANAUD B, 1994, CONTRIB NEPHROL, V108, P12
[6]   SURVIVAL AS AN INDEX OF ADEQUACY OF DIALYSIS [J].
CHARRA, B ;
CALEMARD, E ;
RUFFET, M ;
CHAZOT, C ;
TERRAT, JC ;
VANEL, T ;
LAURENT, G .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1992, 41 (05) :1286-1291
[7]   Fractional direct dialysis quantification: A new approach for prescription and monitoring hemodialysis therapy [J].
Charytan, C ;
Gupta, B ;
Meindel, N ;
Spinowitz, B .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 50 (06) :1845-1849
[8]  
DAUGIRDAS JT, 1995, ASAIO J, V41, pM719, DOI 10.1097/00002480-199507000-00107
[9]  
Depner TA, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P464
[10]  
Depner TA, 1996, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V7, P780