Surgical validation of unenhanced helical computed tomography in acute appendicitis

被引:26
作者
in't Hof, KH
van Lankeren, W
Krestin, GP
Bonjer, HJ
Lange, JF
Beckine, WB
Kazemier, G
机构
[1] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Med Ctr Rijnmond Zuid, Dept Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Med Ctr Rijnmond Zuid, Dept Radiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4724
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgery for pain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen remains a clinical dilemma. This prospective study assessed the accuracy of preoperative unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Methods. One hundred and three adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis underwent unenhanced helical CT of the abdomen. Subsequently, all patients underwent laparoscopic inspection of the abdominal cavity by a surgeon who was blinded to the diagnosis suggested by CT. Patients underwent appropriate surgical therapy accordingly. Follow-up was at least 6 weeks. Results: Appendicitis was diagnosed by CT in 83 patients (80.6 per cent). Acute appendicitis was identified during laparoscopy in 87 patients (84.5 per cent). Prospective interpretation of CT images yielded a sensitivity of 95.4 per cent and a specificity of 100 per cent for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. There were four false-negative scans. In 12 of 20 patients without signs of appendicitis on CT, the scan established the presence of other pathology. At operation no additional pathology was observed in this group and all other diagnoses proved to be correct. Conclusion: Plain helical CT in patients with suspected acute appendicitis provides an accurate diagnosis without the disadvantages of contrast enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:1641 / 1645
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ADDISS, DG ;
SHAFFER, N ;
FOWLER, BS ;
TAUXE, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (05) :910-925
[2]   Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis? [J].
Andersson, RE ;
Hugander, AP ;
Ghazi, SH ;
Ravn, H ;
Offenbartl, SK ;
Nyström, PO ;
Olaison, GP .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 166 (10) :796-802
[3]   ACUTE APPENDICITIS - CT AND US CORRELATION IN 100 PATIENTS [J].
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
BIRNBAUM, BA ;
YEE, J ;
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
ROSHKOW, J ;
GRAY, C .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) :31-35
[4]   Does laparoscopy reduce the incidence of unnecessary appendicectomies? [J].
Barrat, C ;
Catheline, JM ;
Rizk, N ;
Champault, GG .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 9 (01) :27-31
[5]   Randomized clinical trial of early laparoscopy in the management of acute non-specific abdominal pain [J].
Decadt, B ;
Sussman, L ;
Lewis, MPN ;
Secker, A ;
Cohen, L ;
Rogers, C ;
Patel, A ;
Rhodes, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (11) :1383-1386
[6]  
deDombal FT, 1997, EUR J SURG, V163, P323
[7]  
Deutsch A A, 1983, J R Coll Surg Edinb, V28, P35
[8]   CONSEQUENCES OF REMOVAL OF A NORMAL APPENDIX [J].
GOUGH, IR ;
MORRIS, MI ;
PERTNIKOVS, EI ;
MURRAY, MR ;
SMITH, MB ;
BESTMANN, MS .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1983, 1 (08) :370-372
[9]   The diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Clinical assessment versus computed tomography evaluation [J].
Gwynn, LK .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (02) :119-123
[10]   A prospective trial of computed tomography and ultrasonography for diagnosing appendicitis in the atypical patient [J].
Horton, MD ;
Counter, SF ;
Florence, MG ;
Hart, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05) :379-381