Analyzing acceptance politics: Towards an epistemological shift in the public understanding of science and technology

被引:29
作者
Barben, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Consortium Sci Policy & Outcomes, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
RISK COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1177/0963662509335459
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
050302 [传播学];
摘要
Reviewing the main research approaches on the acceptance of science and technology (S&T) developed in the last decades, I will (1) summarize advances achieved and persisting problems concerning the understanding of both the public and S&T. I will show that the acceptance-centered framework has, at least implicitly, been linked to practical efforts in acceptance politics, i.e., attempts to improve a lack of acceptance. In order to investigate conflicts relating to S&T in a more reflective way, I will (2) suggest an epistemological shift towards the analysis of acceptance politics. Building on the distinction between the relevance and resonance of S&T, the ways in which S&T are valuated and gain legitimacy are investigated from a regime analytical perspective. I will (3) exemplify the advantages of this approach by comparatively analyzing the acceptance politics of three biotechnology applications in the USA and Germany. I will (4) conclude with an outlook on future research.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 292
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2007, SCI PUBLIC POLICY
[2]
[Anonymous], 1989, IMPR RISK COMM
[3]
[Anonymous], 2004, Demokratische Technikbewertung
[4]
[Anonymous], NAT NAN IN STRAT PLA
[5]
[Anonymous], 2004, Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties
[6]
BARBEN D, 2007, POLITICAL EC B UNPUB
[7]
Barben D, 2007, HANDBOOK OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES, THIRD EDITION, P979
[8]
BIJKER WE, 1987, SOCIAL CONSTRUCITON
[9]
*CEC, 2004, EUR STRAT NAN
[10]
Dierkes M., 2000, Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology