Can ice-nucleating aerosols affect arctic seasonal climate?

被引:170
作者
Prenni, Anthony J.
Harrington, Jerry Y.
Tjernstrom, Michael
DeMott, Paul J.
Avramov, Alexander
Long, Charles N.
Kreidenweis, Sonia M.
Olsson, Peter Q.
Verlinde, Johannes
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Meteorol, State Coll, PA 16804 USA
[3] Stockholm Univ, Dept Meteorol, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[5] Univ Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Expt Forecast Facil, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-88-4-541
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Mixed-phase stratus clouds are ubiquitous in the Arctic and play an important role in climate in this region. However, climate and regional models have generally proven unsuccessful at simulating Arctic cloudiness, particularly during the colder months. Specifically, models tend to underpredict the amount of liquid water in mixed-phase clouds. The Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiments (M-PACE), conducted from late September through October 2004 in the vicinity of the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) North Slope of Alaska field site, focused on characterizing low-level Arctic stratus clouds. Ice nuclei (IN) measurements were made using a continuous-flow ice thermal diffusion chamber aboard the University of North Dakota's Citation 11 aircraft. These measurements indicated IN concentrations that were Significantly lower than those used in many models. Using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS), we show that these low IN concentrations, as well as inadequate parameterizations of the depletion of IN through nucleation scavenging, may be partially responsible for the poor model predictions. Moreover, we show that this can lead to errors in the modeled surface radiative energy budget of 10-100 W m(-2). Finally, using the measured IN concentrations as input to RAMS and comparing to a mixed-phase cloud observed during M-PACE, we show excellent agreement between modeled and observed liquid water content and net infrared surface flux.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 964 DMI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IMPACTS WARMING ARCT
[3]   ARCTIC AIR-POLLUTION - AN OVERVIEW OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE [J].
BARRIE, LA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1986, 20 (04) :643-663
[4]  
Beesley JA, 1999, J CLIMATE, V12, P395, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0395:TAEOTA>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Ice forming nuclei in the high Arctic [J].
Bigg, EK .
TELLUS SERIES B-CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL METEOROLOGY, 1996, 48 (02) :223-233
[7]   STUDIES OF ICE NUCLEATION BY ARCTIC AEROSOL ON AGASP-II [J].
BORYS, RD .
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 1989, 9 (1-3) :169-185
[8]   Evaluation of polar MM5 simulations of Greenland's atmospheric circulation [J].
Cassano, JJ ;
Box, JE ;
Bromwich, DH ;
Li, L ;
Steffen, K .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D24) :33867-33889
[9]  
Cooper W.A., 1986, Meteorological Monographs, V43, P29, DOI [10.1175/0065-9401-21.43.29, DOI 10.1175/0065-9401-21.43.29]
[10]   RAMS 2001: Current status and future directions [J].
Cotton, WR ;
Pielke, RA ;
Walko, RL ;
Liston, GE ;
Tremback, CJ ;
Jiang, H ;
McAnelly, RL ;
Harrington, JY ;
Nicholls, ME ;
Carrio, GG ;
McFadden, JP .
METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2003, 82 (1-4) :5-29