Trust and tacit knowledge sharing and use

被引:493
作者
Holste, J. Scott [2 ]
Fields, Dail [1 ]
机构
[1] Regent Univ, Sch Global Leadership & Entrepreneurship, Virginia Beach, VA USA
[2] Int Mission Board, Off Overseas Operat, Global Res Dept, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
Trust; Knowledge management; INFORMATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1108/13673271011015615
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to explore the impact of affect-based and cognition-based trust of co-workers on the willingness of professionals to share and use tacit knowledge. Design/methodology/approach - The relationships were examined through data provided by a sample of 202 professionals and managers in world headquarters of an international organization. Findings - The levels of both types of trust influence the extent to which staff members are willing to share and use tacit knowledge. Affect-based trust has a significantly greater effect on the willingness to share tacit knowledge, while cognition-based trust plays a greater role in willingness to use tacit knowledge. Research limitations/implications - The data are cross-sectional and were also collected in one organization. Future studies should consider longitudinal designs across multiple organizations. Alternatively, archival information could be used to measure actual tacit knowledge sharing and use among co-workers. Practical implications - The results indicate that both distinct types of trust are involved in decisions affecting transfer and use of tacit knowledge. This suggests that knowledge management efforts may need to include a finer grained view of the nature of the social networks impacting the knowledge transfer and management process. Originality/value - Previous studies have not examined the differential effects of both affect-based and cognition-based trust on employee willingness to share and use tacit knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 140
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Adler P.S., 2002, The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge, P100
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANAGING GENERATION
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Knowledge emergence: Social, technical and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, J Intellect Capital, DOI [DOI 10.1108/14691930010359252, 10.1108/14691930010359252]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1974, The limits of organization
[6]  
Argote L., 1999, ORG LEARNING CREATIN, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1999.tb01970.x
[7]   Internationalization, tacit knowledge and the top management teams of MNCs [J].
Athanassiou, N ;
Nigh, D .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2000, 31 (03) :471-487
[8]  
AUSTER E, 1994, LIBR TRENDS, V43, P206
[9]  
Bennett III., 1998, Management Decision, V36, P589
[10]   Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation [J].
Blackler, F .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1995, 16 (06) :1021-1046