The Legitimacy of CSR Actions of Publicly Traded Companies Versus Family-Owned Companies

被引:106
作者
Panwar, Rajat [1 ]
Paul, Karen [2 ]
Nybakk, Erlend [3 ]
Hansen, Eric [4 ]
Thompson, Derek [4 ]
机构
[1] Northland Coll, Dept Management, Ashland, WI 54806 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Coll Business Adm, Dept Management & Int Business, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Norwegian Forest & Landscape Inst, N-1431 As, Norway
[4] Oregon State Univ, Coll Forestry, Corvallis, OR 97330 USA
关键词
Legitimacy; Family-owned business; Publicly traded companies; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); Social responsibility orientation; Forest products; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; CONSUMERS; BUSINESS; PERFORMANCE; RESPONSES; VALUES; MARKET; GREEN;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-013-1933-6
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is one of the ways through which companies gain legitimacy. However, CSR actions themselves are subject to public skepticism because of increased public awareness of greenwashing and scandalous corporate behavior. Legitimacy of CSR actions is indeed influenced by the actions of the company but also is rooted in the basic cultural values of a society and in the ideologies of evaluators. This study examines the legitimacy of CSR actions of publicly traded forest products companies as compared to family-owned forest products companies. Results indicate a lower legitimacy for CSR actions of publicly traded companies than for family-owned companies. The study also examines the effect of social responsibility orientation (SRO) of evaluators on the legitimacy accorded to companies' CSR actions. We found that SRO was negatively associated with legitimacy, especially for women. Perceived profitability of companies was negatively associated with legitimacy of CSR actions for publicly traded but not for family-owned companies.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 496
页数:16
相关论文
共 133 条
[1]   Understanding general distrust of corporations [J].
Adams J.E. ;
Highhouse S. ;
Zickar M.J. .
Corporate Reputation Review, 2010, 13 (1) :38-51
[2]   REGULATION AND DISTRUST [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Algan, Yann ;
Cahuc, Pierre ;
Shleifer, Andrei .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2010, 125 (03) :1015-1049
[3]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[4]   FOOLS RUSH IN - THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF INDUSTRY CREATION [J].
ALDRICH, HE ;
FIOL, CM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (04) :645-670
[5]   Corporate Commitment to Global Quality of Life Issues: Do Slack Resources, Industry Affiliations, and Multinational Headquarters Matter? [J].
Amato, Christie H. ;
Amato, Louis H. .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2011, 50 (02) :388-416
[6]   How American core values influence public policy: Lessons from federal aid to small business, 1953-1993 [J].
Anglund, SM .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 11 (01) :23-50
[7]  
[Anonymous], WALL STREET J 1016
[8]  
[Anonymous], I AND ORG
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, KPMG international survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2011
[10]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402