Regional frontal injuries cause distinct impairments in cognitive control

被引:98
作者
Alexander, M. P.
Stuss, D. T.
Picton, T.
Shallice, T.
Gillingham, S.
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, BNU, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] SISSA, I-34014 Trieste, Italy
[5] Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000261482.99569.fb
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lesions of the frontal lobes may impair the capacity of patients to control otherwise intact cognitive operations in the face of ambiguous sensory input or conflicting possible responses. Objective: To address the question of whether focal lesions in different regions of the frontal lobes produced specific impairments in cognitive control. Methods: We evaluated 42 patients with chronic frontal lesions and 38 control subjects on a modified Stroop test that allowed measurement of reaction times and errors. Planned, stratified analyses permitted identification of discrete frontal lesions that are critical for impaired performance. Results: Lesions of the left ventrolateral region produced an increased number of incorrect responses to distractors. Lesions of a large portion of the right superior medial region, including anterior cingulate, supplementary motor area ( SMA), pre- SMA, and dorsolateral areas, caused a slow reaction time and a decreased number of correct responses to targets. Conclusion: Lesions in two distinct frontal regions impair cognitive control for a Stroop task, and the mechanisms of impairment are specific to the region of injury. This is support for a general proposal that the supervisory system is constructed of distinct subsystems.
引用
收藏
页码:1515 / 1523
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Impaired concentration due to frontal lobe damage from two distinct lesion sites [J].
Alexander, MP ;
Stuss, DT ;
Shallice, T ;
Picton, TW ;
Gillingham, S .
NEUROLOGY, 2005, 65 (04) :572-579
[2]   THE DUALITY OF THE CINGULATE GYRUS IN MONKEY - NEUROANATOMICAL STUDY AND FUNCTIONAL HYPOTHESIS [J].
BALEYDIER, C ;
MAUGUIERE, F .
BRAIN, 1980, 103 (SEP) :525-554
[3]   Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions [J].
Bechara, A ;
Tranel, D ;
Damasio, H .
BRAIN, 2000, 123 :2189-2202
[4]  
Beck A.T., 1993, BECK DEPRESSION INVE
[5]   INVESTIGATIONS OF THE FUNCTIONAL-ANATOMY OF ATTENTION USING THE STROOP TEST [J].
BENCH, CJ ;
FRITH, CD ;
GRASBY, PM ;
FRISTON, KJ ;
PAULESU, E ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
DOLAN, RJ .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1993, 31 (09) :907-922
[6]  
Benton A.L., 1994, Contributions to neuropsychological assessment, V2nd
[7]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[8]   Selection for cognitive control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study on the selection of task-relevant information [J].
Brass, M ;
von Cramon, DY .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 24 (40) :8847-8852
[9]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[10]   Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions [J].
Burgess, PW ;
Shallice, T .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (04) :263-272