Propofol compared with the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as induction agents for neonatal endotracheal intubation: A randomized, controlled trial

被引:106
作者
Ghanta, Satish
Abdel-Latif, Mohamed E.
Lui, Kei
Ravindranathan, Hari
Awad, John
Oei, Julee
机构
[1] Royal Hosp Women, Dept Neworn Care, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Heath, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[3] Sydney Children Hosp, Dept Paediat Intens Care, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
关键词
propofol; endotracheal intubation; suxamethonium; neonatal; randomized control trial;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2006-2708
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this work was to compare the efficacy of propofol, a hypnotic agent, to the regimen of morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium as an induction agent for nonemergency neonatal endotracheal intubation. We hypothesized that propofol aids intubation by allowing the continuation of spontaneous breathing. Patients and Methods. We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial of infants who required nonemergency endotracheal intubation. Primary outcome was successful intubation confirmed by chest auscultation and clinical examination of the infant. Results. Infants randomly assigned to propofol (n = 33) and the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen (n = 30) were comparable in median gestational age (27 vs 28 weeks), birth weight (1020 vs 1095 g), weight at intubation (1068 vs 1275 g), and age at intubation (4 vs 3 days). Sleep or muscle relaxation were achieved within 60 seconds in both groups, but time to achieve successful intubation was more than twice as fast with propofol (120 vs 260 seconds). Blood pressure and heart rates were not different, but intraprocedural oxygen saturations were significantly lower in infants on the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen (trough arterial oxygen saturation: 60% vs 80%). Nasal/oral trauma was less common, and recovery time was shorter (780 vs 1425 seconds) in the propofol group. No significant adverse effects were seen in either group. Conclusions. Propofol is more effective than the morphine, atropine, and suxamethonium regimen as an induction agent to facilitate neonatal nasal endotracheal intubation. Importantly, hypoxemia was less severe, probably because of the maintenance of spontaneous breathing. A controlled environment may have promoted the ease of intubation, resulting in less trauma. The shorter duration of action would be advantageous in a compromised infant.
引用
收藏
页码:E1248 / E1255
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Randomised controlled trial of thiopental for intubation in neonates [J].
Bhutada, A ;
Sahni, R ;
Rastogi, S ;
Wung, JT .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2000, 82 (01) :F34-F37
[2]  
BORGEAT A, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V71, P511
[3]   Morphine does not provide adequate analgesia for acute procedural pain among preterm neonates [J].
Carbajal, R ;
Lenclen, R ;
Jugie, M ;
Paupe, A ;
Barton, BA ;
Anand, KJS .
PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (06) :1494-1500
[4]   A comparison of awake versus paralyzed tracheal intubation for infants with pyloric stenosis [J].
Cook-Sather, SD ;
Tulloch, HV ;
Cnaan, A ;
Nicolson, SC ;
Cubina, ML ;
Gallagher, PR ;
Schreiner, MS .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (05) :945-951
[5]  
De Cosmo G, 2005, CURR DRUG TARGETS, V6, P741
[6]   Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit [J].
Dempsey, E. M. ;
Al Hazzani, F. ;
Faucher, D. ;
Barrington, K. J. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2006, 91 (04) :F279-F282
[7]  
Derbyshire SWG, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P795
[8]  
DONOHOO E, MIMS ONLINE
[9]   Tracheal intubating conditions and apnoea time after small-dose succinylcholine are not modified by the choice of induction agent [J].
El-Orbany, MI ;
Joseph, NJ ;
Salem, MR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (05) :710-714
[10]   CUTANEOUS HYPERSENSITIVITY FOLLOWING PERIPHERAL TISSUE-DAMAGE IN NEWBORN-INFANTS AND ITS REVERSAL WITH TOPICAL ANESTHESIA [J].
FITZGERALD, M ;
MILLARD, C ;
MCINTOSH, N .
PAIN, 1989, 39 (01) :31-36