Clinically relevant reduction in risk of recurrence of superficial bladder cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence diagnosis: 8-year results of prospective randomized study

被引:207
作者
Denzinger, Stefan
Burger, Maximilian
Walter, Bernhard
Knuechel, Ruth
Roessler, Wolfgang
Wieland, Wolf F.
Filbeck, Thomas
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Urol, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp, Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Pathol, Aachen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES Several studies have shown that 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)-induced fluorescence cystoscopy improves the detection of superficial bladder cancer. The results have suggested a reduced rate of recurrent tumors with the use of 5-ALA fluorescence before bladder tumor resection. We performed a prospective, randomized trial to investigate whether the long-term tumor recurrence and residual tumor rates can be decreased using 5-ALA fluorescence diagnosis (FD). METHODS A total of 301 patients with suspected superficial bladder carcinoma were randomized to transurethral resection (TUR) using conventional white light (WL) or FD. TUR was repeated to evaluate the residual tumor rate. In addition, patients were followed up for a median of 83 (WL) and 86 (FD) months to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Of the 301 patients, 191 were available for the efficacy analysis. The residual tumor rate was 25.2% in the WL arm versus 4.5% in the FD arm (P <0.0001). The RFS rate after 2, 4, 6, and 8 years was 73%, 64%, 54%, and 45% in the WL group and 88%, 84%, 79%, and 71% in the I'D group, respectively, revealing a statistically significant difference in favor of fluorescent TUR (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS 5-ALA-induced FD is significantly superior statistically to conventional WL TUR with respect to the residual tumor rate and RFS. This advantage of decreased bladder tumor recurrence risk was maintained with high statistical significance for at least 8 years. The differences in RFS imply that FD offers a clinically relevant procedure to reduce the incidence of tumor recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 679
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   NON-INVASIVE PAPILLARY CARCINOMA OF BLADDER ASSOCIATED WITH CARCINOMA INSITU [J].
ALTHAUSEN, AF ;
PROUT, GR ;
DALY, JJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 116 (05) :575-580
[2]   Long-term benefit of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence assisted transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer: 5-year results of a prospective randomized study [J].
Daniltchenko, DI ;
Riedl, CR ;
Sachs, MD ;
Koenig, F ;
Daha, KL ;
Pflueger, H ;
Loening, SA ;
Schnorr, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (06) :2129-2133
[3]   Role of 5-aminolevulinic acid in the diagnosis and treatment of superficial bladder cancer:: Improvement in diagnostic sensitivity [J].
De Dominicis, C ;
Liberti, M ;
Perugia, G ;
De Nunzio, C ;
Sciobica, F ;
Zuccalà, A ;
Sarkozy, A ;
Iori, F .
UROLOGY, 2001, 57 (06) :1059-1062
[4]   Clinical results of the transurethral resection and evaluation of superficial bladder carcinomas by means of fluorescence diagnosis after intravesical instillation of 5-aminolevulinic acid [J].
Filbeck, T ;
Roessler, W ;
Knuechel, R ;
Straub, M ;
Kiel, HJ ;
Wieland, WF .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) :117-121
[5]  
Filbeck T, 2003, UROLOGE A, V42, P1366, DOI 10.1007/s00120-003-0355-y
[6]   Clinically relevant improvement of recurrence-free survival with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced fluorescence diagnosis in patients with superficial bladder tumors [J].
Filbeck, T ;
Pichlmeier, U ;
Knuechel, R ;
Wieland, WF ;
Roessler, W .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (01) :67-71
[7]  
FLAMM J, 1989, EUR UROL, V16, P81
[8]   Detection of loss of heterozygosity in the p53 tumor-suppressor gene with PCR in the urine of patients with bladder cancer [J].
Friedrich, MG ;
Erbersdobler, A ;
Schwaibold, H ;
Conrad, S ;
Huland, E ;
Huland, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) :1039-1042
[9]  
GROSSMAN HB, 2004, J UROLOGY, V171, P263
[10]   Bladder cancer [J].
Gwynn, Eric S. ;
Clark, Peter E. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2006, 18 (03) :277-283